![]() |
|
Underwater
Quite possible, however, 13 Kc and 18 Kc fall into the VLF range. The
original poster mentioned ELF. ELF is down in the "cycles", we didn't have "kilos" at our ELF transmitters ;) Scott N0EDV Fred W4JLE wrote: As I remember, we used 18 Kc and 13 Kc. We didn't have hertz in those days :) We were able to copy Jim Creek when submerged in the Red Sea. Jim Creek had 13 miles of wire suspended between two mountains in what was probably the worlds biggest capacitance hat. All CW , because even a 150 cycle shift for rtty would have thrown the tank circuit out of resonance. Now no one would be able to copy it... "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Asimov wrote: Thanks for the info. I had read that submarines communicated in a band of a few 10's of Hz because of the problems with water. As for the polar molecules aligning themselves, this implies it takes some time to achieve. Thus there is a resonnant point in this and if there is resonnance then there might be anti-resonnance too. Might you know where this natural molecular resonnance is? Might this be the standard microwave oven frequency? Sorry, I don't know. If any of the readers of this newsgroup do, I'd really appreciate your enlightening us. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Underwater
One could couple into a crystal oscillator NAA's signal and then listen 15
kHz to the side of the oscillator's frequency for great CW practice. BIG signal. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: "Fred W4JLE" wrote in message ... As I remember, we used 18 Kc and 13 Kc. We didn't have hertz in those days :) We were able to copy Jim Creek when submerged in the Red Sea. Jim Creek had 13 miles of wire suspended between two mountains in what was probably the worlds biggest capacitance hat. All CW , because even a 150 cycle shift for rtty would have thrown the tank circuit out of resonance. Now no one would be able to copy it... |
Underwater
Scott wrote:
Slight correction...our (U.S.) subs using ELF worked at about 50-80 Hz. I worked at one of the land-based transmitters for 5 years. Scott Tim Wescott wrote: Asimov wrote: Hi, I was thinking about why radio wave communications are not generally used underwater. Basically I'm asking what are the quantitative components of the underwater medium that makes it impractical except for perhaps very short ranges. Things like attenuation, impedance, etc... Does any one here know these details or have them handy? A*s*i*m*o*v ... Acme Corp: Unlimited credit for disadvantaged coyotes. The conductivity of water causes great attenuation at all but very low frequencies. Think "skin effect". That having been said, the US Navy (and probably all other folks with subs) use extremely low frequency RF (30kHz IIRC) to communicate with strategic nuclear subs. Boy I'm glad for that "IIRC" I put in there. Thanks. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com |
Underwater
No problem! The Navy kept fairly quiet about their ELF communications.
They shut down the ELF transmitters a little over a year ago. Wonder what they're using as a replacement? They were doing experiments with a satellite based green laser I had heard (while I was still working at Project ELF)...The ELF signal used MSK modulation (Minimum Shift Keying), which is similar to RTTY, only the shift between Mark and Space was 4 or 8 Hz, depending on rate of transmission. Took 5 minutes to send 3 alpha characters...most hams wouldn't have the patience to copy at that speed ;) Scott Tim Wescott wrote: Scott wrote: Slight correction...our (U.S.) subs using ELF worked at about 50-80 Hz. I worked at one of the land-based transmitters for 5 years. Scott Tim Wescott wrote: Asimov wrote: Hi, I was thinking about why radio wave communications are not generally used underwater. Basically I'm asking what are the quantitative components of the underwater medium that makes it impractical except for perhaps very short ranges. Things like attenuation, impedance, etc... Does any one here know these details or have them handy? A*s*i*m*o*v ... Acme Corp: Unlimited credit for disadvantaged coyotes. The conductivity of water causes great attenuation at all but very low frequencies. Think "skin effect". That having been said, the US Navy (and probably all other folks with subs) use extremely low frequency RF (30kHz IIRC) to communicate with strategic nuclear subs. Boy I'm glad for that "IIRC" I put in there. Thanks. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com