Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geee-----we're on a roll! Thanks for good info on my previous query. Now,
a new one: Just put a small MFJ -949E tuner into my antenna system. Thing works great. The only weird thing is I notice the tuning is extremely "tight" and "goosey". The slightest movement of the variable caps produces jumps in meter readings. Having said that, I can still manage with it. Years ago, this kind of tuning effect was from hand capacity, when just about everything in the shack was RF hot. However, this isn't what we're dealing with here. Once my controls are set, touching around the tuner anywhere doesn't alter anything. So, it's not hand capacity/coupling. What is this effect indicative of? Just curious. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
RB wrote: Geee-----we're on a roll! Thanks for good info on my previous query. Now, a new one: Just put a small MFJ -949E tuner into my antenna system. Thing works great. The only weird thing is I notice the tuning is extremely "tight" and "goosey". The slightest movement of the variable caps produces jumps in meter readings. Having said that, I can still manage with it. Years ago, this kind of tuning effect was from hand capacity, when just about everything in the shack was RF hot. However, this isn't what we're dealing with here. Once my controls are set, touching around the tuner anywhere doesn't alter anything. So, it's not hand capacity/coupling. What is this effect indicative of? Just curious. Any of several things. This could indicate that your caps have noisy (dirty or oxidized or burned) sliding contacts to the stator. It could indicate that the caps have a somewhat "sticky" bearing arrangement, which is subject to both stiction and some amount of backlash and overshoot. It could indicate that you are attempting to tune a highly reactive or otherwise-difficult load, and have one or both of the caps set to a low-mesh (and thus high-reactance) setting. If the rotor and stator plates in those caps have the same radius throughout (I can't tell from the picture), then when the caps are mostly un-meshed, a very small change in the position of the rotor can make a proportionally- large change in capacitance and change the reactance (and thus the matching) quite a lot. There can be a definite advantage to using air-variable caps which have plates (on either the rotor or stator) which are tapered in radius, from one end of the rotation to the other... it makes the adjustments at the mostly-unmeshed, low-capacitance end rather less critical. Take a look at a typical "broadcast variable" capacitor from an older AM radio set, and you'll probably see this sort of construction. With a C-L-C T-match tuner, it's usually possible to achieve a match at several different settings of the controls. If you've achieved a match, and find that both of the caps are set up to a fairly-far- unmeshed setting, try switching the inductor down to the next-lower inductance setting, and then tweaking both caps in the direction of greater mesh (more capacitance, lower reactance). This may boost your tuner's electrical efficiency, and may also make the tuning less critical and "jumpy". -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() RB wrote: Geee-----we're on a roll! Thanks for good info on my previous query. Now, a new one: Just put a small MFJ -949E tuner into my antenna system. Thing works great. The only weird thing is I notice the tuning is extremely "tight" and "goosey". The slightest movement of the variable caps produces jumps in meter readings. Having said that, I can still manage with it. Years ago, this kind of tuning effect was from hand capacity, when just about everything in the shack was RF hot. However, this isn't what we're dealing with here. Once my controls are set, touching around the tuner anywhere doesn't alter anything. So, it's not hand capacity/coupling. What is this effect indicative of? Just curious. I suspect it is caused by an effective Hi-Q load on the antenna side of the tuner. That could be a high reaactive component or a low resistive component of the input impedance to the coax. What kind of antenna and transmission line are you using? I run a 140 foot long center fed doublet withh 600 ohm open wire tuned feeders and observe the same type of indications on 60 meters. The resistive component of the input impedance is 10 ohms with 15 ohms of inductive reactance. It's not a problem, just sharp tuning. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ant tuner question | Antenna | |||
Tuner smoke! | Antenna | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||
FC-20 Antenna Tuner broken on 10m ? | Antenna |