| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:40:25 -0800, Roy Lewallen
wrote: wrote: I leave only this. At VHF and up it's common to use a shorted 1/4 wave section for second harmonic suppression at the output. Very effective and dirt cheap. The finals are not the least bit bothered. If a short appeared near a 1/4 wave node at operating frequency it might go unnoticed. I'm afraid it wouldn't go unnoticed. The transmitter would see an open circuit, instead of the proper load of typically 50 ohms. The effect on the transmitter would be the same as disconnecting the feedline at the transmitter. Roy Lewallen, W7EL I did use the word "might" rather than will. Actually it depends on the real life characteristics of the short. If it were a perfect short (in theory) yes. But if there is any varience from that it's going to be harder to predict. Likely it world look more like a higher impedence, but not completely. In all likelyhood the parameter that needs to be know more than any one its frequency. At 432 it's impact would be very different than say 7.2mhz. Allison |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
| Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
| End Effect on folded dipoles/monopoles? | Antenna | |||
| Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||