Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:00:51 -0800, dansawyeror
wrote: After making an error here between the effects of odd versus even quarter waves at the source I am getting closer to being able to measure the impedance of a loaded vertical 'in the shack'. At the moment this is limited to a single frequency 'close' to a frequency of interest. But even that is a triumph. Is that as hard as it looks? Take an example: You have an impedance meter to measure complex impedance at the frequency of interest, being 3.6MHz for the sake of the example. (This technique depends on the behaviour of the tranmission lines, you would want to be sure that the transmission lines are in good condition and work as characterised.) You measure the impedance 40-j15 for example looking into a cascade of 5m of RG58 and 50m of 9913 connected to the unknown load. The Z at the load end of the RG58 is 60.42-j20.13. That is the Z looking into the 9913. The Z at the load end of the 9913 is 41.94+j18.03. Is this the kind of thing you are trying to do? Bear in mind that you cannot know the characteristics of the lines etc to support the precision shown above. You also need to keep in mind the sensitivity of the results to changes in parameters to form a view of the confidence limits of your measurements. This took more time to write about than it did to find the results. Owen -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Failure of Poor Concepts in Discussing Glare Reduction | Antenna | |||
The Failure of Poor Concepts in Discussing Thin Layer Reflections | Antenna | |||
HF antenna for boat portable? | Antenna | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
Take off angle | Antenna |