Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:13:17 -0700, Wes Stewart wrote: I've provided a spreadsheet that facilitates the calculations over a range of frequencies. www.qsl.net/n7ws/8405.zip So a couple of trips to the end of the cable are all that are required to calibrate the setup. (I must confess, I haven't tried this program with a line much over a few inches in length to determine whether my calibration functions can handle it, but I think so.) That's a good idea! Wes, does it collect enough information to be able to correctly calculate a phase constant on longer feedline. Some work for the next version perhaps? A potential problem is cable loss. When the line Z0 is close to the impedance being measured, loss doesn't have much effect. But if the two impedances are very different, a surprisingly small amount of loss can have a significant effect on the observed input impedance. Of course, the short circuit measurement will give you the cable loss, which can then be used in the calibration process. It's just that you wouldn't be able to do the correction by the simple equivalent of a Smith chart rotation. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Failure of Poor Concepts in Discussing Glare Reduction | Antenna | |||
The Failure of Poor Concepts in Discussing Thin Layer Reflections | Antenna | |||
HF antenna for boat portable? | Antenna | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
Take off angle | Antenna |