LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 5th 03, 06:28 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:11:53 +1300, MikeN
wrote:

Thanks George

I can make a UHF bridge and a dummy load rfom SMD resistors which I
think should be good enough for 70 cm. Any comments?

Mike N


Hi Mike,

George has a point. Building a bridge begs the question: which one?

In the collection of works under bridges, there are many, most of
which are entirely unsuited to the job.

The first problems one would encounter is balance and isolation. At
UHF this actually is simple because visualization lends to revealing
those flaws in the implementation. IF, of course, you look at it with
that perspective. Another problem is scale. Your bridge might
present a significant intrusion into the variable being measured.

How do you put a 6X3X9 project box holding your bridge into practice
with an antenna that is the same size? The problem of isolation. SMD
components are a good first pass, but a bridge has its variables to
perform the measurement. How big is the read-out scale to the knob in
relation to that same antenna? The smaller you make it, the closer
you get your face to the antenna (isolation and balance again). How
do you adjust the balance without literally putting your hand into the
equation?

OK, so you make the bridge a remote device, you measure through a
line. Then the question becomes, are you measuring the antenna, or
the antenna AND the line? You need to isolate the line, and you do
that through a reference. Where did you get the reference?
Presumably another SMD, but was the line choked?

Another, classic solution is to scale your problems away. Take what
instrumentation you have, that exhibits the precision you need, that
contains as much error as you can tolerate, and scale a model of your
antenna to suit IT. Take a measure and reverse scale the model
antenna physical design to the target frequency. What you have to
watch out for here are those variables that are scale/frequency
variant like ground loss, dissipation factors and such. Again the
problem of perspective IF you don't know what to look for.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017