LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old February 3rd 06, 02:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default Verticals versus Horizontal Dipoles


"Richard Fry" wrote in message
...
"Richard Harrison" wrote:
The earth`s attenuation of low-angle radiation from a 1/4-wave

vertical
antenna has a significant effect on the vertical radiation

pattern. ee
Fig. 54-1 on page 465 of B. Whitfield Griffith`s "Radio-Electronic
Transmission Fundamentals". This figure shows field intensity

curves
versus vertical angle from a 1/4-wave vertical antenna radiating 1
kilowatt over earth of average conductivity. Anything below about
5-degrees is gone, eaten by the earth`s losses.

________________

This certainly is not true for frequencies below about 2 MHz. If it

was
true, MW broadcast stations would have no groundwave coverage --

which of
course is the only useful coverage they _do_ have in the daytime.

A monopole vertical radiator of any length up to 5/8-wave, when used

with a
ground system of ~120 buried radials each ~1/2-wave long, radiates

its peak
field very nearly in the horizontal plane regardless of the

conductivity of
the ground in which the radials are buried. This gain is within a

few
percent of the theoretical peak gain for these radiators when

working
against an infinite, perfectly conducting ground plane, as was

demonstrated
by the field tests of Brown, Lewis & Epstein in 1937. This

principle has
been accepted and used by the FCC and other regulating agencies, and

has
been field-proven in thousands of installations going back many

decades.

Once "launched," the groundwave signal is affected by ground

conductivity
along the propagation path, earth curvature, obstructions etc.

Groundwave
path loss increases with increasing frequency, and above some

frequency in
the low HF range, the groundwave is unable to serve a practical

purpose.
But that doesn't necessarily mean that the transmit antenna did not

generate
the groundwave in the first place, ie, that it radiated zero field

in the
horizontal plane and at very low elevation angles.

==========================================

Rich, all what you say is quite true - except that groundwave is
radiated at ALL frequencies from a vertical of 5/8-wave or shorter.

Useful propagation occurs at 30 MHz and below. But loss in the ground
and loss due to obstructions above 1/4-wave in height is high. Solid
ragchews across town and small city are quite possible on the 10m
band.

For predicting groundwave propagation from VLF to HF, download program
GRNDWAV3 from website below.
----
.................................................. ..........
Regards from Reg, G4FGQ
For Free Radio Design Software go to
http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp
.................................................. ..........


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Grounding Steve Rabinowitz Shortwave 31 December 14th 05 05:26 AM
Mostly horizontal polarization of HF arriving at my antenna? Kristinn Andersen, TF3KX Antenna 6 March 15th 05 05:34 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas Ron Antenna 5 July 23rd 03 03:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017