Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Bob" wrote - Tnxs for that Reg What is the generally accepted "number" in either S points or dB of employing horizontal instead of vertical for noise reasons? ========================================= Bob, First of all we must entirely disregard the opinions of individuals who may be located in high or low noise districts, areas or regions. I myself live in an industrial, densely populated, area near to a factory with a dozen electrical arc welding machines. Others live out in the wilderness, isolated from modern, electrical noise generating civilisation. There exist statistics of AVERAGE field strength noise levels experienced in cities, small towns and in the open countryside. I have forgotten where to find such statistics but Google may help. The statistics depend very much on frequency. They vary greatly between ELF and HF. Noise levels decrease by crudely 10 dB or 20 dB per octave or decade increase in frequency. Furthermore, at ELF and VLF, noise propagates to far greater distances than at HF. There are always continuous world-wide electrical storms somewhere on the Earth's surface. At 10 KHz noise levels may be several hundred milli-volts per meter. At 7 MHz they may be microvolts per meter. At 30 MHz they are of the order of the internal receiver noise. The noise level indicated by your S-meter is a function of the size of the antenna relative to wavelength and antenna efficiency. It can be crudely calibrated in terms of micro-volts per metre using a little arithmetic. Learn how to estimate. In my own experience (which as I say should be disregarded) the difference in noise level between a horizontal dipole and a vertical is about one or two S-points on the 160 metre band. (Or a difference of 6 or 12 dB.) On the other hand, distant stations come in stronger using a 150-feet, vertical (inverted-L) than they do on a dipole. Not that I have ever used the two types of antenna simultaneously. It's just my opinion. So I prefer the inverted-L. In general, the signal to noise ratio is better and there is less fading. One hop instead of two, via the F2-layer, at night, using a dipole? ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
Mostly horizontal polarization of HF arriving at my antenna? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |