Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: What I was trying to point out is the similarities between Dr. Best's QEX article term, 2*sqrt(P1)*sqrt(P2)*cos(theta), In _Optics_, Hecht's interference term 2*sqrt(I1*I2)*cos(theta), and the above 2*s11*s12*a1*a2(cos theta) term. Seems to me, they are all interference terms. If (0 deg = theta 90 deg) then the interference is constructive. If (90 deg theta = 180 deg) then the interference is destructive. (a + b) * (a + b) = a^2 + 2ab + b^2 Wow, I made my own "interference term"! Yep, assuming those are phasor voltages normalized to the square root of Z0, you sure did. That's one of the advantages of an s-parameter analysis. With the voltages normalized to the square root of Z0, the square of any voltage equals V^2/Z0 = power. a^2 would be P1, b^2 would be P2, and 2ab would equal to 2*sqrt(P1)*sqrt(P2)*cos(theta) [phase angle between a and b] -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |