| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy,
No I have not decoupled the feed from the antenna. I will try that tonight. I have wound a 2:1 balun for testing. (anticipating at least a 25 ohm input impedance) I have measured the antenna with two different instruments. One is an Autek analyzer at the antenna, the second is with an 8405a at the end of 100+ feed of cable. They both show the same results. Thanks - Dan Roy Lewallen wrote: dansawyeror wrote: . . . The question is: What is the basis of the difference between predicted and measured values? 1. Have you decoupled your feedline? If you're not using a feedline, have you decoupled your measurement device? 2. Have you substituted a lumped impedance of about 16 + j133 ohms for the antenna and observed what your measurement equipment indicates? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
| Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
| Putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||