Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy,
No I have not decoupled the feed from the antenna. I will try that tonight. I have wound a 2:1 balun for testing. (anticipating at least a 25 ohm input impedance) I have measured the antenna with two different instruments. One is an Autek analyzer at the antenna, the second is with an 8405a at the end of 100+ feed of cable. They both show the same results. Thanks - Dan Roy Lewallen wrote: dansawyeror wrote: . . . The question is: What is the basis of the difference between predicted and measured values? 1. Have you decoupled your feedline? If you're not using a feedline, have you decoupled your measurement device? 2. Have you substituted a lumped impedance of about 16 + j133 ohms for the antenna and observed what your measurement equipment indicates? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |