Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:19:37 -0600, Bob Bob wrote:
Check the resistor. One of the first things done. At DC of course. Dont think I ever replaced it. Was considering playing with it last time but since moving the frequency also bought it back to normal operating conditon I couldnt see it as a reason. Hi Bob, DC is so remote from the application as to be only an approximation. There's also the prospects of reactance to consider too. When you say you can see a frequency dependency, you are almost guaranteeing that "tuning" has been injected into an otherwise wideband design. From your position in the company you have two paths: 1. Announce the design is FUBAR, or 2. Find an ad-hoc solution and forget theory because you are in no position to re-engineer the design. #2 is a dangerous path to take for the sake of the company's perspective, although it may be more politic if the design department is populated with prima-donnas. #1 will accomplish one of two things, the design will be corrected, or you will be educated - possibly both. Most designers appreciate hearing what your experience has revealed. Most of my techs enjoyed pounding my designs to find the weak seams. One fellow had a small transistor radio that he would put on top of the microprocessor to listen to the software running. He could always tell when one of my patches went south. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[question] current/voltage amplitude inducted in antenna | Antenna |