Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Shrader wrote:
SNIP SNIP SNIP: for a high power solid state station, 1500 watts, the matched RMS voltage is 274 volts, the maximum peak to peak is 274*2.828 = 774 volts p-p. Any surge device must accommodate the high RMS voltage and yet the receiver/transceiver front end must tolerate 774 volts p-p without damage. Deacon Dave, W1MCE I gently disagree with your inclusion of the word receiver (with respect to tolerating 774 volts). That's why the T/R switch has an isolation spec that is much greater than 0dB. In receive mode the transceiver might be damaged by voltages much less than 774 volts. To confirm, simply transmit 1500 watts into your receiver. Your analysis is probably more-or-less valid for 1500 watt transmitters (or similar transceivers when transmitting). Unfortunately, most transceivers have a very high duty cycle for being in receive mode. |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You sniped his last staement. He concluded by this that no protection scheme
was going to help, other than disconecting, as that voltage would damage the reciever. "J. Harvey" wrote in message om... Dave Shrader wrote: SNIP SNIP SNIP: for a high power solid state station, 1500 watts, the matched RMS voltage is 274 volts, the maximum peak to peak is 274*2.828 = 774 volts p-p. Any surge device must accommodate the high RMS voltage and yet the receiver/transceiver front end must tolerate 774 volts p-p without damage. Deacon Dave, W1MCE I gently disagree with your inclusion of the word receiver (with respect to tolerating 774 volts). That's why the T/R switch has an isolation spec that is much greater than 0dB. In receive mode the transceiver might be damaged by voltages much less than 774 volts. To confirm, simply transmit 1500 watts into your receiver. Your analysis is probably more-or-less valid for 1500 watt transmitters (or similar transceivers when transmitting). Unfortunately, most transceivers have a very high duty cycle for being in receive mode. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CW" wrote:
You snipped his last statement. He concluded by this that no protection scheme was going to help, other than disconecting, as that voltage would damage the receiver. You're right - I misinterpreted his statement. I failed to notice that he intended the word 'must' to represent an impossible (or at least difficult) requirement. Regards. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Cowley" wrote in message ... strike. A spark gap that can conduct a lightening strike would be the size of a small truck. The only way to make sure you have a working station after a lightening strike on your aerials is to take out good insurance. vy 73 Andy, M1EBV Nonsense. Every insulated AM broadcast station antenna has an arc gap at the base. How many stations get struck by lightning each year and keep on operating? Pete |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uncle Peter wrote:
Every insulated AM broadcast station antenna has an arc gap at the base. How many stations get struck by lightning each year and keep on operating? 1732? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to advise that an AM Broadcast station and an Amateur
station have at least one significant difference. The AM Station is most likely running a vacuum tube amplifier at high voltages with high voltage capacitors in the output stage. Also, they do not have a solid state receiver connected to the same transmission line. Therefore, they have a high tolerance to peak voltages. Most Amateur stations, excluding members of the Kilowatt Alley Society, have solid state finals and very sensitive solid state receiver circuits that do not have KV level tolerance to transient voltages. Conclusion, your argument is not totally valid! Deacon Dave, W1MCE Uncle Peter wrote: "Andy Cowley" wrote in message ... strike. A spark gap that can conduct a lightening strike would be the size of a small truck. The only way to make sure you have a working station after a lightening strike on your aerials is to take out good insurance. vy 73 Andy, M1EBV Nonsense. Every insulated AM broadcast station antenna has an arc gap at the base. How many stations get struck by lightning each year and keep on operating? Pete |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:09:28 GMT, Dave Shrader
wrote: I would like to advise that an AM Broadcast station and an Amateur station have at least one significant difference. The AM Station is most likely running a vacuum tube amplifier at high voltages with high voltage capacitors in the output stage. Also, they do not have a solid state receiver connected to the same transmission line. Therefore, they have a high tolerance to peak voltages. My tower gets hit on average about 3 times a year. In the last 19 years I've only lost the front end out of one receiver and had a piece of heliax blown out about 30 feet from the top of the tower. I rarely if ever, disconnect any equipment except the computers and with those I worry about the phone lines more than the radio station. In the same period I've lost three computers. Most Amateur stations, excluding members of the Kilowatt Alley Society, have solid state finals and very sensitive solid state receiver circuits that do not have KV level tolerance to transient voltages. I have two KW amps hooked up to two different systems with 4 solid state transceivers connected to the antennas. The HF rigs are connected to the antennas through the relays in the KW amps. So the receivers are always on the antennas except when transmitting. Other than the amps everything here is solid state. One of the antenna systems is near the bottom of http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/tower.htm here's a bit about the ground system: http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/ground.htm Conclusion, your argument is not totally valid! Works for me, or has so far. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com Return address modified due to dumb virus checkers Deacon Dave, W1MCE Uncle Peter wrote: "Andy Cowley" wrote in message ... strike. A spark gap that can conduct a lightening strike would be the size of a small truck. The only way to make sure you have a working station after a lightening strike on your aerials is to take out good insurance. vy 73 Andy, M1EBV Nonsense. Every insulated AM broadcast station antenna has an arc gap at the base. How many stations get struck by lightning each year and keep on operating? Pete |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:07:07 -0500, " Uncle Peter"
wrote: "Andy Cowley" wrote in message ... strike. A spark gap that can conduct a lightening strike would be the size of a small truck. Most damage comes from the voltage induced by nearby strikes rather than direct hits, so the spark gap doesn't have to be a monster. Devices like PolyPhasers keep the voltage across the coax to a low level. If they get poked too hard they short. If they get poked really hard they blow apart. I had one short about a year ago, but there was no damage to the equipment. OTOH the PolyPhaser is over $50. Still, it was a good trade. The rig on that line is a TM-V7A and it was on at the time of the strike. The only way to make sure you have a working station after a lightening strike on your aerials is to take out good insurance. In a way. It means you will eventually have a working station. OTOH there are no guarantee, but it never hurts to move the odds in your favor by using good grounding techniques and protective devices, or throwing the coax out the window. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com Return address modified due to dumb virus checkers vy 73 Andy, M1EBV Nonsense. Every insulated AM broadcast station antenna has an arc gap at the base. How many stations get struck by lightning each year and keep on operating? Pete |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Link coupling is possible with a Faraday shield on the link only.
The main tuning coils have a 'gap' of sufficient size to accommodate the link. The link is shielded. Back in the 'olden days', 1955, I used a shielded link from B&W in a 40 meter home brew project [a pair of 807s in PP]. Deacon Dave, W1MCE + + + |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lightning Strokes, Masts & Volts | Antenna | |||
Antenna mast grounding question | Antenna | |||
Lightning protection question revisited | Antenna |