Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big Nose wrote:
Currently I am looking into the problem of using a common antenna for two VHF transceivers. One operates 30 - 90 MHz and the other from 30 - 512 MHz. They would both be tuned into seperate frequencies and need to share a common broadband, omni directional, vertical monopole. I think I am getting myself a bit confused (or should I say more confused), do I need to used a diplexer? Would a T piece not suffice as both sets would be tuned to different frequencies and seperation and harmonics would be considered? Would these factors not mean that the input impedance to the set tuned into the different frequency would remain high thus not effect matching? Simple... Get a two port circulator. That'll solve your problem ( but at a price. Try E-Bay ). At your low frequencies, try build one yourself. Regarding the impedance, that is not that problematic. You can basically transform any impedance to your taste. You will incur signal loss tho'. Also, as you unfortunately are looking at the lower end of the RF spectra, all these parts will be bulky but it's still possible. Cheers Dan / M0DFI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Andersson wrote in
: Big Nose wrote: Currently I am looking into the problem of using a common antenna for two VHF transceivers. One operates 30 - 90 MHz and the other from 30 - 512 MHz. They would both be tuned into seperate frequencies and need to share a common broadband, omni directional, vertical monopole. I think I am getting myself a bit confused (or should I say more confused), do I need to used a diplexer? Would a T piece not suffice as both sets would be tuned to different frequencies and seperation and harmonics would be considered? Would these factors not mean that the input impedance to the set tuned into the different frequency would remain high thus not effect matching? Simple... Get a two port circulator. That'll solve your problem ( but at a price. Try E-Bay ). At your low frequencies, try build one yourself. Regarding the impedance, that is not that problematic. You can basically transform any impedance to your taste. You will incur signal loss tho'. Also, as you unfortunately are looking at the lower end of the RF spectra, all these parts will be bulky but it's still possible. Possible, but a bit tricky to set up, since you'll need quite a few db of isolation between the ports for this to work even reasonably. 60db would be enough for separations in the range of 10mhz or more, but below that, you're starting to need 75 or 80db in order to hear something on the other receiver. If it's only necessary to use one radio at a time, then maybe 25 or 30db would do it OK, since all you really need to do then is prevent receiver damage. But if it's desired to use both radios simultaneously, then the more isolation, the better. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Oldridge wrote:
Dan Andersson wrote in : Big Nose wrote: Currently I am looking into the problem of using a common antenna for two VHF transceivers. One operates 30 - 90 MHz and the other from 30 - 512 MHz. They would both be tuned into seperate frequencies and need to share a common broadband, omni directional, vertical monopole. I think I am getting myself a bit confused (or should I say more confused), do I need to used a diplexer? Would a T piece not suffice as both sets would be tuned to different frequencies and seperation and harmonics would be considered? Would these factors not mean that the input impedance to the set tuned into the different frequency would remain high thus not effect matching? Simple... Get a two port circulator. That'll solve your problem ( but at a price. Try E-Bay ). At your low frequencies, try build one yourself. Regarding the impedance, that is not that problematic. You can basically transform any impedance to your taste. You will incur signal loss tho'. Also, as you unfortunately are looking at the lower end of the RF spectra, all these parts will be bulky but it's still possible. Possible, but a bit tricky to set up, since you'll need quite a few db of isolation between the ports for this to work even reasonably. 60db would be enough for separations in the range of 10mhz or more, but below that, you're starting to need 75 or 80db in order to hear something on the other receiver. If it's only necessary to use one radio at a time, then maybe 25 or 30db would do it OK, since all you really need to do then is prevent receiver damage. But if it's desired to use both radios simultaneously, then the more isolation, the better. Well, it's actually not that tricky! If you use a dual port circulator, you will not have any problems. The only problem is to find a broadband dual port circulator. Dan |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't think its quite that simple (circulator) and I'm not sure how the circulator solves the problem particularly if it has only two ports. In addition a circulator for 30-512 probably isn't in existence. Perhaps more explanation is needed on this, Dan. This depends on the actual frequencies. A diplexer must have two non-overlapping frequency ranges to "split" in two. Like one is 30 - 90 and the other is 100-512. Each can be quite wide. What your post has is OVERLAPPING frequencies and that is a problem. If one was 30-90 and the other 120-512 that would be easier. There are units that are quite inexpensive that will do 2-150 and 200-512. You seem to have the correct idea about the impedance "seen" at one, but at the frequency of the other, but this applies when using some methods, not all. If the two radios will be operated at the same time, then the problem is more strict in the requirements of the method used. When one transmitter is transmitting, it puts considerable power into the system at the transmit frequency, and harmonics as you well know, however, a transmitter also puts out considerable NOISE all over the place. There is typically more noise nearer to the transmit frequency. This noise must be reduced to prevent it from desensing the other receiver and this may require additional filtering. I know this makes things more difficult, but from your post, it looks that way. 73, Steve, K,9.D;C'I "Dan Andersson" wrote in message ... Big Nose wrote: Currently I am looking into the problem of using a common antenna for two VHF transceivers. One operates 30 - 90 MHz and the other from 30 - 512 MHz. They would both be tuned into seperate frequencies and need to share a common broadband, omni directional, vertical monopole. I think I am getting myself a bit confused (or should I say more confused), do I need to used a diplexer? Would a T piece not suffice as both sets would be tuned to different frequencies and seperation and harmonics would be considered? Would these factors not mean that the input impedance to the set tuned into the different frequency would remain high thus not effect matching? Simple... Get a two port circulator. That'll solve your problem ( but at a price. Try E-Bay ). At your low frequencies, try build one yourself. Regarding the impedance, that is not that problematic. You can basically transform any impedance to your taste. You will incur signal loss tho'. Also, as you unfortunately are looking at the lower end of the RF spectra, all these parts will be bulky but it's still possible. Cheers Dan / M0DFI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Antenna Tuners Aren't Necessarily Useful for Shortwave Listening - Question Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna Tuners - Do You Have An Opinion ? | Shortwave | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment |