Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 13:51:11 -0400, "Yuri Blanarovich"
wrote: But graphic representation gives rough idea to realize that it is not unimportant or worthy ignoring. Hi Yuri, But it gives nothing of that impression at all. If it were important, then you could give me solid numbers instead of an art review. If you wanna get precise metrics, stick the two versions of coil definition in the EZNEC, generate the curves and compare areas under the curve from the top of the coil to the tip. Then tell us that is negligible and was not worth of this exercise. Yuri, I did that two years ago. You have yet to disagree with the pitiful difference and the best chance of you doing it yourself is: I will get to it soon too. I heard that two years ago too. You don't give any impression that the topic at hand is nearly as important to you as duking it out with Tom. But if after two years of swinging and you still haven't connected a solid KO, don't expect us to hand you a TKO (because your Technical part is a marshmallow punch). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |