Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check my article that describes the controversy, shows some proof of reality
and then efforts of the "gurus" to deny it and "reason" why it can't be so. http://www.k3bu.us/loadingcoils.htm The problem is that back in 1953 in QST article there was erroneous conclusion/statement made, which propagated through the books, until W9UCW measured the current across the loading coils and found that there is significant drop from one end to the other, and the rest is (ongoing) history Yuri, K3BU.us "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... Not that I could fan the flames any more anyhow, but just what was the original discussion about anyhow? As in Cecil says what, and those disagreeing with him say what? I'm curious how something that doesn't seem that complex can generate so many weeks of acrimony and vitriol! I don't know the answer - but then again, I'm not really sure what the question is. But I do know where to look it up.... - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |