Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
Understanding the congrence among many methods/theories is a very nice thing, for it gives one confidence that they are correct, and the ability to apply the one that's most convenient to any particular problem. I would not want to take away wave theory, or any other valid theory, from you; I would only ask that you better understand that your pet is not the ONLY valid explanation. The point is that in any disagreement between the lumped-circuit model and a properly applied distributed network model, the lumped-circuit model loses *EVERY* time since the lumped-circuit model is a *SUBSET* of the distributed network model. If your current charge concepts disagree with Maxwell's equations, Maxwell's equations win *EVERY* time. Maxwell's equations do not require individual charge carriers. They work just fine considering only fields in the aether. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |