Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
So, PLEASE wake up and quit trying to attribute this "lumped circuit" stuff, and the completely independent charge quantization stuff, to this discussion. It simply is NOT there. It is absolutely NOT the point of all this. I agree so please tell that to everyone who is defending the lumped circuit presuppositions. One cannot use the presuppositions of the lumped circuit model to prove those same presuppositions!!! If your current charge concepts disagree with Maxwell's equations, Maxwell's equations win *EVERY* time. Maxwell's equations do not require individual charge carriers. They work just fine considering only fields in the aether. And PLEASE wake up and quit screwing up the attributions on this newsgroup. You didn't say the above! I said the above. Why do you deliberately falsify the attributions? Such is illegal in Texas. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |