Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Mike Coslo wrote: Yuri Blanarovich wrote: Check my article that describes the controversy, shows some proof of reality and then efforts of the "gurus" to deny it and "reason" why it can't be so. http://www.k3bu.us/loadingcoils.htm The problem is that back in 1953 in QST article there was erroneous conclusion/statement made, which propagated through the books, until W9UCW measured the current across the loading coils and found that there is significant drop from one end to the other, and the rest is (ongoing) history Hmm, certainly it would seem to make sense that: The current in a typical loading coil in the shortened antennas drops across the coil roughly corresponding to the segment of the radiator it replaces. Quote from your page. I would not expect anything else. If the loading coil is making the antenna act like a physically longer antenna, other "qualities" of that simulation are likely to be similar. Is there a reason why the coil would *not* do this? Yes, many, and they've been discussed here at length. That this concept is wrong can and has been shown by theory, modeling, and measurement. I made and posted measurements on this newsgroup in November 2003 which demonstrated clearly that the presumption is false. The loading coil isn't making the antenna act like a physically longer antenna. In the extreme case of a physically short inductor at the feedpoint, it's simply modifying the feedpoint impedance and has no effect whatever on the antenna's radiation. As the inductor gets longer, it does become some part of the antenna, but adding an inductor which resonates, say, a 45 degree physical radiator doesn't make the antenna act like a 90 degree physical radiator. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Oooops, carefull here. As far as I know, nobody has claimed that inserted loading coil replaces the "missing" degrees of the radiator in terms of providing magical properties that would look like that "replaced" portion of the antenna, or make the antenna act like 90 degree full size physical radiator. What we are saying that the loading coil appears to replace "missing" electrical degrees of the radiator in order to make it resonant, that is back to 90 electrical degrees (has to be in order to resonant), which rest of the existing "straight" radiator forces it to do (+/-). Radiation properties and efficiency of the loaded antenna is proportional to the area under the current curve. It is obvious to anyone comparing the area under the current curve of full size quarter wave radiator vs. loaded radiator that there is huge difference in area under the curve and performance, efficiency, which is known and been verified by numerous measurements. HOW the current curve is modified by different loadings and position along the radiator is important in knowing how the current distribution curve along the radiator is modified. The whole controversy is that "gurus" claim current doesn't drop across the coil, while we say that it does, therefore making the area under current curve above the coil smaller and effciency of loaded antenna worse than they believe and insist on. Again, when applied in modeling programs, wrong assumption will produce erroneous results, which will be magnified in multielement antenna designs. So the "gurus" basically ignore behavior of coil in the standing wave environment along the loaded radiator, where the current drops from max at base to zero at the tip, but coil would magicaly resist that, because, bla, bla, bla.... (see their "reasons") So while everyone knows (?) that standing wave current drops acros (along) the wire (all the antenna books show that), but it is "impossible" to drop along the coiled wire (real inductance - coil, loading stub). Reality and measurments prove that, but according to them "it can't be so". I am already gathering necessary hardware to do more experiments, measurements to show what is really happening, and will prepare articles how to model and apply it to antenna design. I would challenge the "unbelievers" to join me and repeat the tests, to see wasaaaap. 73 Yuri, K3BU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |