Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote:
Most of my measurements have been at the self-resonant frequency of a loading coil. That isn't the design frequency though, is it? No, so I changed my approach. My present approach is to take a self-resonant coil and use only part of the coil on the *same* frequency, e.g. use half the coil as a loading coil on the *same* frequency. That way, the velocity factor should be roughly the same in either case. I'm not sure I have this straight. I think I understand Tom's info, yet this has me completely baffled. I accept his magnitude measurements as probably accurate and reasonable. His phase measurements were meaningless since standing wave current phase doesn't change relative to the source and therefore cannot be used to measure phase shift along a wire or through a coil. The standing wave current phase is the same from end to end in a 1/2WL thin-wire dipole. It cannot be used to determine the phase shift through a wire or a dipole. EZNEC reports the same thing. This is key to understanding the misconceptions involved and why the phase measurements were meaningless. Would the short answer be that you do not find any correlation? *Nobody* has made a valid measurement of the delay through a coil. There's nothing to correlate. One cannot use a signal with unchanging phase to measure that delay. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Scanner | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna |