Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:45:05 -0500, John Popelish wrote: It may not be the approach you are familiar with, but I think it is valid. The transformer just has a lot of core loss, if you use a ferrite optimized for a much lower frequency. And that loss shows up as if it were a resistor connected across the ends of the two windings. If a low loss ferrite (at the operating frequency) is used, then the impedance across the windings is dominated by inductance, as one normally expects with a transformer. But the analysis handles the whole range of cases. Hi John, Through these last comments, and those that go before, you have entirely missed the boat of both the dynamics involved (this is not a magnetic circuit being described, and there are NO magnetic lines broken in a typical circuit in a balanced configuration), and the topology. Specifically to this last, you still do not seem to comprehend that a coax has three conductors and is a six terminal device. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to try to straighten me out on this, but if there is no magnetic lines broken (whatever that means) why use a magnetic core? Why wouldn't disks of carbon work just as well. They are certainly resistive. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Program - Coaxial Choke | Antenna | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Boatanchors | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment |