Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the input guys.
I think that I'm going to break out the '259B and check antenna impedances on various bands first. I'm probably going to go with the 1:1 choke balun even if the common mode impedance on all bands is not significantly higher than the feedpoint impedance. I guess it shouldn't be worse than what I'm matching now. I think that I don't actually want a 4:1 transformer, as I know there are a couple of bands where the impedance is fairly low, and if I had a functioning 4:1 current balun, I'd be transforming it even lower before the tuner can take a crack at it, and that just seems counterproductive. I'm living with some degree of imbalance now (which I've tested in that the antenna SWR is different if I reverse the legs on the "balun" output... they aren't equal lengths, they're whatever I can throw out with a slingshot and a weight after a windstorm) A 1:1 true current balun on some bands and a not-quite-effective-current-balun on others is probably better than what I've got now... 73, Dan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A "single conversion" question | Shortwave | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||
FT857 mobile 80m tuner? | Equipment |