Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yuri Blanarovich" wrote in message ... Reg wrote: The type of antenna or its radiation pattern has nothing whatever to do with the path taken by the radio wave through the ionosphere. The take-off angle and its name, generated by EZNEC, can be very misleading. It has to do. It allows us to direct the RF under desired angle to hit the layer or region that supports the propagation to the chosen target. ========================================= Yuri, The elevation angle of the radio path from the transmitter on its way to the target changes with the number of hops. How does Eznec know the number of hops? How does Eznec know which angle is correct? How does Eznec know the height of the reflecting layers? How does Eznec know the distances at which the radio wave returns to Earth to be re-reflected? Eznec doesn't know. And neither does the radio operator unless he estimates everything AFTER the event. Radio waves follow paths dictated by trigonometry and geometry and are entirely independent of the idiosyncrasies of radio antennas. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
That pesky 7238 kHz CW signal | Homebrew | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew |