Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:15:24 +0100, "Reg Edwards"
wrote: The elevation angle ... changes .... Radio waves follow paths dictated by trigonometry and geometry a curious trig and geometry at that entirely independent of the idiosyncrasies of radio antennas. and unzipped software propagation forecasters too? Hi Reggie, I especially enjoy how you attempt to poison the restaurant to kill waiter: How does Eznec know How does Eznec know How does Eznec know How does Eznec know Eznec doesn't know Which presumes a claim (four of them in fact) not made (except by you, but then anyone can put antenna modeling tools to foolish propagation uses). I won't ask for substantiation on your geometry, Lord Kelvinator has turned his back on these absurd proceedings too. I will leave you with the last exasperated gasp. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
That pesky 7238 kHz CW signal | Homebrew | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew |