Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 May 2006 13:30:31 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: It is hard to look at a radiation pattern, conclude that the take-off angle is the only angle of radiation, and then blame it on EZNEC! I knew a ham in Chandler, AZ who would adjust not only the direction but the height of his beam for maximum signal. I assume by adjusting the height, he was changing his TOA. I have heard of many hams stacking beams vertically to get that earlier signal on one beam, and later in the day, the other beam gets the stronger signal. Together, they still amplify the signal, but sometimes one does much better than others at the TOA. -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
That pesky 7238 kHz CW signal | Homebrew | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew |