Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 03:55:45 GMT, Robert Casey
wrote: I think everyone knows that the old "Ethernet" "thicknet" is just foam RG8U with very good shielding. I was fishing some power BX cable in the walls/ceilings of the house, and took the opportunity to also fish some coax for the ham shack upstairs. I figured that I would use the Ethernet cable I had laying around as it is 50 ohm coax. And lower loss than RG58. Not that it much matters for HF for a 20 foot length. But if I wanted to operate 6m or 2m it would begin to. I have a vertical in the back yard fed by about 15 feet of some rather ancient RG58 that then passes thru a hole in the house's wall about 2 feet above grade (well sealed with caulking). And in the basement a few feet in it meets the ethernet I just ran. This reduced the clutter of coax inside the shack for better spouse acceptance factor... Used a wall plate intended for phone jacks and F connectors to make a neat termination for the Ethernet (a BNC connector). Or if you have one an N barrel. I don't think any IT guys use Ethernet cable anymore, so maybe you can ask them to save some for you when they gut the ceilings, etc at work. Be careful of the power handling capabilities of thicknet coax removed from service. Be aware also that it has been in place for up to twenty-five years. You do know how thicknet is accessed don't you? A hole is drilled in the insulation and braid. A device called a "vampire tap" is then clamped around the cable. The tap has a probe that (sometimes!) contacts the center conductor. That can't be good for the characteristics of the cable when removed, or the weather-proofing either. Stop being such a damn cheapskate and buy some good, new coax. It's better for your radios, it's less trouble for you and you'll do your little bit to help the economy. Oh, yeah, don't forget to recycle the old 10b2 and 10b5 cabling, that's just about all it's good for. Russ, KF4WXD and CCNP |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Russ wrote:
Be careful of the power handling capabilities of thicknet coax removed from service. I'm not looking to run a kilowatt thru it. And I know that foam coax is less capable than solid coax. I'm only running 100W anyway. Be aware also that it has been in place for up to twenty-five years. You do know how thicknet is accessed don't you? A hole is drilled in the insulation and braid. A device called a "vampire tap" is then clamped around the cable. The tap has a probe that (sometimes!) contacts the center conductor. That can't be good for the characteristics of the cable when removed, or the weather-proofing either. I'm aware of vampire taps, and the cable I used had none. And the cable has been indoors all the time, and in good condition. I used to use it on 2m and it worked well for that. Stop being such a damn cheapskate and buy some good, new coax. Wouldn't be a true ham, then.... ;-) Russ, KF4WXD and CCNP 73s |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |