Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All,
There have been replies with some good comments and recommendations for not taking meaningless measurements. First, the objective: Modeling software predicts a loaded vertical with a 'good' ground will have a low input impedance. This is a step on the trail to measure that impedance. Second, a vector voltmeter, when feed by directional couplers can be used to measure impedance angle and therefore resonance. It can also be use to measure the forward and re-flected power. The setup is a calibrated signal generator, connected to a 7904 scope (A plug in) for reference purposes only, connected to a pair of couplers connected to the vector voltmeter, connected to test antenna. The frequency is 147 MHz. The system is near resonance. The voltage measurements are taken with a pair of 10x probes, connected to a dual channel plug in (B plug in). There is no significant change to the signal or the vector voltmeter readings when the probe leads are attached. The phase changes by less the 10 degrees and none of the amplitudes change noticeably. I do not believe the measurement system is materially influencing the measurements. The next step is to make a current probe to attach to the base of the antenna. The result is the two 'independent' systems, the couplers and the vector voltmeter, and the voltage and current probe, should yield similar antenna impedances. - Dan dansawyeror wrote: Thank you all for your replys, they were all interesting. The first set of test measurements were taken on a 2-meter loaded vertical. Two voltage readings were taken via a high impedance scope probe, one at the feedpoint of the coax center connection, and the other from the connection of the coax shield to the antenna ground. In this case the ground is a simple raised metal 1/4 inch screen mesh about 10 square feet. The antenna was tuned to resonance. The relative voltage readings were the center conductor was 2x the ground reading. I do not have a way to measure current at the base at this time. However looking ahead, with power = iv would this imply about 2 times the energy is being radiated from the vertical element as through the base? Thanks Dan - kb0qil dansawyeror wrote: Good morning, This question is: Taking measurements at the antenna and what they mean? The antenna is a loaded vertical over a set of untuned radials. The feed is 50 Ohm coax with a 1:1 isolation transformer at the antenna. I intend to run a separate coax for measurement purposes to the feed point, stimulate the antenna with a 10 mw signal at the operating frequency, and measure the voltage across the antenna feed and the ground connection. Will the voltages indicate the relative RF impedance of antenna (including loading coil) versus the ground? If the ground were near perfect the voltage at the feedpoint should be close to zero. These voltages should indicate the power disapation difference between the antenna and the ground. Thanks, Dan |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:53:00 -0700, dansawyeror
wrote: The frequency is 147 MHz. The system is near resonance. The voltage measurements are taken with a pair of 10x probes, connected to a dual channel plug in (B plug in). Hi Dan, The use of 10x scope probes is an illusion at best, and certainly not the way the "pros" do it by a long stretch. There is no significant change to the signal or the vector voltmeter readings when the probe leads are attached. Compared to what? This is again an example of ambiguity that offers nothing tangible except a "feel-good" kind of experience. Do you know why there is "no significant change?" If you replace a 1x feed with a 10x probe, wouldn't you expect change? Your faith is based on what would normally set off red lights and have warning flags being waved. The phase changes by less the 10 degrees and none of the amplitudes change noticeably. I do not believe the measurement system is materially influencing the measurements. This is a faith-based feeling instead of rational expectation. It is overwhelmingly obvious by your statement above that the system is wholly out of whack with expectations. A simple review of the actual probe can be instructive in this case to explain why you see little change, and why you wouldn't use a scope probe in the first place. Most 10x scope probes are not rated into the VHF. The 10x probe is generally a 10 MOhm resistor with a parallel 10pf variable capacitor. Simple math would reveal that at 147 MHz that cap presents about 100 Ohms reactance - hardly worth the effort and certainly no where near a 10x function. The equipment 10x probe (not a 10x scope probe) has only 2pF of capacitance (5 times the reactance of a scope probe) and a tenth of the 10x scope probe resistance. What you are reading as scaled voltage is not what is present to be measured, but a complex, phase shifted value. You have absolutely no rational basis to use a 10x probe of any kind. Skip this unnecessary elaboration. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In addition to the weaknesses of scope probes mentioned by Richard is
the ground lead. Even a short one has considerable reactance at VHF, and its use will promote common mode current on the outside of the probe cable. Any decent scope measurement at very high frequencies is done with an adapter which connects directly to the ground ring near the end of the probe, through a very short conductor. An example is the one sold by Tektronix, P/N 013-0085-00 the last time I checked. Even it must be used with some care. I don't see any hope in your making meaningful measurement with the setup you describe -- there are too many potential sources of serious error. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Shortwave Antenna used determines the type of Matching Transformer | Shortwave | |||
AM/MW Loop Antenna - Inductive Coupling -vice- Resistor Spoiler | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
No CounterPoise - Portable Antenna System | Shortwave | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |