Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 12th 06, 01:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
dansawyeror
 
Posts: n/a
Default measurements at the antenna

All,

There have been replies with some good comments and recommendations for not
taking meaningless measurements.

First, the objective: Modeling software predicts a loaded vertical with a 'good'
ground will have a low input impedance. This is a step on the trail to measure
that impedance.

Second, a vector voltmeter, when feed by directional couplers can be used to
measure impedance angle and therefore resonance. It can also be use to measure
the forward and re-flected power.

The setup is a calibrated signal generator, connected to a 7904 scope (A plug
in) for reference purposes only, connected to a pair of couplers connected to
the vector voltmeter, connected to test antenna. The frequency is 147 MHz. The
system is near resonance. The voltage measurements are taken with a pair of 10x
probes, connected to a dual channel plug in (B plug in).

There is no significant change to the signal or the vector voltmeter readings
when the probe leads are attached. The phase changes by less the 10 degrees and
none of the amplitudes change noticeably. I do not believe the measurement
system is materially influencing the measurements.

The next step is to make a current probe to attach to the base of the antenna.
The result is the two 'independent' systems, the couplers and the vector
voltmeter, and the voltage and current probe, should yield similar antenna
impedances.

- Dan

dansawyeror wrote:
Thank you all for your replys, they were all interesting.

The first set of test measurements were taken on a 2-meter loaded
vertical. Two voltage readings were taken via a high impedance scope
probe, one at the feedpoint of the coax center connection, and the other
from the connection of the coax shield to the antenna ground. In this
case the ground is a simple raised metal 1/4 inch screen mesh about 10
square feet.

The antenna was tuned to resonance. The relative voltage readings were
the center conductor was 2x the ground reading. I do not have a way to
measure current at the base at this time.

However looking ahead, with power = iv would this imply about 2 times
the energy is being radiated from the vertical element as through the base?

Thanks Dan - kb0qil

dansawyeror wrote:

Good morning,

This question is: Taking measurements at the antenna and what they mean?

The antenna is a loaded vertical over a set of untuned radials. The
feed is 50 Ohm coax with a 1:1 isolation transformer at the antenna. I
intend to run a separate coax for measurement purposes to the feed
point, stimulate the antenna with a 10 mw signal at the operating
frequency, and measure the voltage across the antenna feed and the
ground connection.

Will the voltages indicate the relative RF impedance of antenna
(including loading coil) versus the ground? If the ground were near
perfect the voltage at the feedpoint should be close to zero. These
voltages should indicate the power disapation difference between the
antenna and the ground.

Thanks,
Dan

  #2   Report Post  
Old June 12th 06, 07:44 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default measurements at the antenna

On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:53:00 -0700, dansawyeror
wrote:

The frequency is 147 MHz. The
system is near resonance. The voltage measurements are taken with a pair of 10x
probes, connected to a dual channel plug in (B plug in).


Hi Dan,

The use of 10x scope probes is an illusion at best, and certainly not
the way the "pros" do it by a long stretch.

There is no significant change to the signal or the vector voltmeter readings
when the probe leads are attached.


Compared to what? This is again an example of ambiguity that offers
nothing tangible except a "feel-good" kind of experience. Do you know
why there is "no significant change?" If you replace a 1x feed with a
10x probe, wouldn't you expect change? Your faith is based on what
would normally set off red lights and have warning flags being waved.

The phase changes by less the 10 degrees and
none of the amplitudes change noticeably. I do not believe the measurement
system is materially influencing the measurements.


This is a faith-based feeling instead of rational expectation. It is
overwhelmingly obvious by your statement above that the system is
wholly out of whack with expectations.

A simple review of the actual probe can be instructive in this case to
explain why you see little change, and why you wouldn't use a scope
probe in the first place. Most 10x scope probes are not rated into
the VHF. The 10x probe is generally a 10 MOhm resistor with a
parallel 10pf variable capacitor. Simple math would reveal that at
147 MHz that cap presents about 100 Ohms reactance - hardly worth the
effort and certainly no where near a 10x function. The equipment 10x
probe (not a 10x scope probe) has only 2pF of capacitance (5 times the
reactance of a scope probe) and a tenth of the 10x scope probe
resistance. What you are reading as scaled voltage is not what is
present to be measured, but a complex, phase shifted value.

You have absolutely no rational basis to use a 10x probe of any kind.
Skip this unnecessary elaboration.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 12th 06, 10:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default measurements at the antenna

In addition to the weaknesses of scope probes mentioned by Richard is
the ground lead. Even a short one has considerable reactance at VHF, and
its use will promote common mode current on the outside of the probe
cable. Any decent scope measurement at very high frequencies is done
with an adapter which connects directly to the ground ring near the end
of the probe, through a very short conductor. An example is the one sold
by Tektronix, P/N 013-0085-00 the last time I checked. Even it must be
used with some care.

I don't see any hope in your making meaningful measurement with the
setup you describe -- there are too many potential sources of serious error.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Shortwave Antenna used determines the type of Matching Transformer RHF Shortwave 13 May 14th 06 10:50 PM
AM/MW Loop Antenna - Inductive Coupling -vice- Resistor Spoiler RHF Shortwave 1 May 9th 06 09:51 AM
Grounding Steve Rabinowitz Shortwave 31 December 14th 05 05:26 AM
No CounterPoise - Portable Antenna System RHF Shortwave 1 November 19th 05 06:18 PM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017