Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd have to look at the antenna in my own antenna modeling program,
which I don't have right now to be sure of this, but I'd guess it has something to do with the antenna being an integer number of wavelengths above ground. 100 feet is almost exactly 10 wavelengths at 98.1MHz. Do you have an antenna program that lets you look at the elevation pattern of the antenna? My guess is that at 10 wavelengths high, there's more energy in higher angle lobes which I would expect that a line-of-sight coverage prediction program doesn't report anything about. Dan N3OX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CHU Time Station : Western Canada Coverage Proposal // Fax to NRC is Ottawa SVP | Shortwave | |||
CHU Time Station : Western Canada Coverage Proposal | Shortwave | |||
Any ? Shortwave Radio coverage of the 2006 Winter Olympics in Turino, Italy ? | Shortwave | |||
Election coverage all day by BBC | Shortwave | |||
Portable, Affordable, 10 Mile Coverage | Equipment |