Yea that's what I was expecting you to say. I can remember seeing
descriptions of this "as if the ground plane is folded down around the coax"

I think I might try this ;-)

Thanks again all!

de ka2pbt


Cecil Moore wrote:
John Popelish wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
*******************+ ********************+
| ====================+========
1/4WL +--------------------------------- coax
| ====================+========
*******************+ ********************+


I don't understand how this would work.

Now that you mention it, neither do I. I just copied it from
the 1993 ARRL Handbook, Fig. 3, on page 14-4. I do know how it
works when feeding a balanced antenna. Let me redraw it with
one that I know works.

*******************+ +******************** choke
| +=================================
1/4WL +--------------------------------- coax
| +=================================
*******************+ +******************** choke

Cecil Moore wrote:
John Popelish wrote:
(snip)
I don't understand how this would work.


Now that you mention it, neither do I. I just copied it from
the 1993 ARRL Handbook, Fig. 3, on page 14-4. I do know how it
works when feeding a balanced antenna. Let me redraw it with
one that I know works.

*******************+ +******************** choke
| +=================================
1/4WL +--------------------------------- coax
| +=================================
*******************+ +******************** choke

That is what i was trying to describe, and makes sense to me.
Thanks for drawing it.

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:52:32 +0000, Rob Roschewsk
wrote:

If I want something made of wire, and omni directional what would be my
best bet? Inverted-V ?

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

An inverted vee with the apex angle at about 90 degrees is almost
perfectly omnidirectional.

Bill, W6WRT