Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
1) Why waste money on the balun?
2) If you have 65 feet run a random wire and tune it. 3) The 80 meter hamsticks are mostly turns of wire that radiate poorly. 4) Hamstick dipoles are always a compromise antenna. The two 80 meter sticks on 80 meters will have very narrow bandwidth, very low radiation resistance, about 4 to 6 ohms, and very low efficiency. They will not be much better on the other bands. 5) Your secret weapons is: you have 65 feet so run a sloper and a tuner. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Marvin Rosen wrote: Some zany thoughts on an 80-10 mtr shorty antenna: 1. Two 80 mtr hamsticks in a dipole configuration fed in the center with ladder line & an appropriate tuner. 2. The same as above except with a 4:1 balun in the center of the dipole. The low impeadance end of the balun would be at the center of the dipole. Either configuration would be placed 65 ft above gnd. Is there any merit or possibilities concerning the above? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need Hamstick ZL-Special (or similar phased array) help | Antenna |