![]() |
1/2 of a wavelength inside of 72 ohm RG-59 TV coax
In http://www.scannerway.8m.com/cgi-bin.../antennas.html it says
(eg. 2953/144Mhz = 20.5 inches). This is 1/4th of a wavelength... (eg. 8,859/144Mhz = 61.5 inches) This is 1/2 of a wavelength inside of 72 ohm RG-59 TV coax. I don't get it, doesn't he mean 3/4? And isn't the wavelength the same within or without? I suppose aside from this, the instructions are good, no? |
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:08:53 +0800, Dan Jacobson
wrote: In http://www.scannerway.8m.com/cgi-bin.../antennas.html it says (eg. 2953/144Mhz = 20.5 inches). This is 1/4th of a wavelength... (eg. 8,859/144Mhz = 61.5 inches) This is 1/2 of a wavelength inside of 72 ohm RG-59 TV coax. I don't get it, doesn't he mean 3/4? And isn't the wavelength the same within or without? I suppose aside from this, the instructions are good, no? Hi Dan, You've forgotten the velocity of propagation inside a transmission line is different from a wire in free space (the author suspects it is 66% of free space). The outside electrical dimension of coax is not the same as wire in free space either, as it has a thick dielectric covering (and there are variations for conductor thickness as well). This is why the common advice of cut long and tune to resonance so often attends construction projects. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com