![]() |
Is It double bazooka less noisy?
Actually, I recall your mentioning it before, Cecil.
But I'll be damned if I'll go search threads from near half a decade ago to prove it. Brand new topic or not, it involves bazookas. Cheers H. NQ5H "Cecil Moore" wrote in message .com... H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H wrote: This is hilarious. No matter in what context, it appears bazookas cause long threads. I don't remember the bazooka ever being discussed before in the context of precipitation static so it is essentially a brand new topic. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Is It double bazooka less noisy?
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
I don't remember the bazooka ever being discussed before in the context of precipitation static so it is essentially a brand new topic. H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H wrote: Actually, I recall your mentioning it before, Cecil. Couldn't be. I didn't know what the schematic was for a double bazooka until I looked it up last week. The double bazooka uses the same techniques that are used on airplanes to reduce precipitation static. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com