LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 20th 06, 02:22 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 232
Default Length & number of radials

Reg Edwards wrote:

Your programs results also dramatically disagree with Brown, Lewis,

and
Epstein's data in one of the most comprehensive radial studies ever
done.

73 tom

=========================================

All three of B,L & E forgot to determine ground resistivity and
permittivity. That's hardly comprehensive!


Do your predictions fit BL&E's measurements, or those of Sevick, for
*any* assumed values of ground resistivity and permittivity?

Also , please tell us more about the fan of 1.0m radials, on the ground,
that will give ninety-several percent feedpoint efficiency.


--
73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Radials hasan schiers Antenna 0 March 22nd 06 10:42 PM
Question on antenna symantics Jimmy Antenna 28 January 27th 04 01:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017