Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() hasan schiers wrote: Are you saying (for example), that the feedpoint R of a 1/4 w vertical against perfect ground cannot be reliably estimated at 37 ohms? No. I'm not saying that. If it can, then isn't 37/R a measure of efficiency? No. A ground can have transmission line effects. As such, it can modify impedances. Is it really possible to reduce ground losses to the absolute minimum and not have a corresponding increase in field strength? You are assuming a reduction of ground loss or an increase of ground loss always indicates a certain resistance change at the feedpoint. That assumption is not correct Hans. For example, I can measure feed resistance of a mobile antenna on my truck. By moving the antenna around I can vary the "apparent" ground resistance from a few ohms to perhaps 30 ohms with very little change in ground loss. All I'm saying is the feedpoint reistance change when using a 1/4 wl series fed radiator does not correspond to change in field strength. I know that to be absolutely true, because I and others have seen that happen. 73 Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna |