Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#101
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:11:17 +0100, "Reg Edwards" wrote: Thank you very much for the results on 8 radials. As expected, it seems that for small numbers of radials the resonance effects are begining to appear again. I have ideas as to why this should happen. Hi Reggie, You "should" if you had read Brown, Lewis, and Epstein. They discussed this nearly 70 years ago. Cut 'im a break Richard! He was just a little kid at the time! ;^) `73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
#102
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() They've shown that with about 100 radials of 0.4 lamba length the result is almost perfect ground, regardless of the ground conditions beneath the radials. I contend that using the radial setup as described above will always result in a near-perfect ground at any HF frequency, with close to 100 percent efficiency. Would you not agree? Walt, W2DU ====================================== My dear Walt, I haver never disagreed. How can one disagree with a statement of the bleeding obvious? Indeed, my program RADIAL3 confirms it. And so will NEC4 if you will allow it time to generate some results. ----- Reg, G4FGQ. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
Radials | Antenna |