Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Keith wrote:
"For DX transmitting on the lower bands, vertical polarization is the best way to go." In some cases. If that were always the case, why do commercial shortwave stations all use horizontal polarization for both point-to-point service and broadcasting? During my years in shortwave broadcasting, I never saw a single vertically polarized antenna used for HF transmitting. My experience is not unique. E.A. Laport was Chief Engineer, RCA International Division of Radio Corporation of America (RCA). For many years RCA was the largest short-wave communications organization in the world. In his book, "Radio Antenna Engineering", Ed Laport says: "The earliest high-frequency beam antennas used vertical polarization, but subsequent evolution has caused the almost universal use of horizontal polarization. There may be a reversion to vertical polarization in the future for certain applications." It was natural to try vertical polarization first for directional arrays as low and medium frequencies were first exploited for radio and these had to use vertical antennas. It was uneconomical to elevate horizontal antennas to heights necessary for sky wave performance and there is no ground wave propagation of horizontally polarized waves. The directional vertical antenna had been developed early in broadcasting by Brown, Lewis, and Epstein who did their RCA development work at HF for economy and convenience. Work was already in place for the earliest vertical HF beam antennas. These only evolved into the universal horizontal polarization at HF due to real advantages. Huge investments are made in HF transmitting antenna farms. I worked in a station that had a farm of over 400 acres of HF antennas, all horizontally polarized. This was no flip of a coin decision. The decision was based on the preponderance of experience at the time. Our paths were so long that we had to consider 2-hops in addition to a single hop on most. There surely must be instances where vertical polarization proves better than horizontal, but these are exceptions, not the rule. An example might be an antenna closely surrounded by the sea. A vertical array should be ideal. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Measuring radiation resistance | Antenna | |||
RF radiation detector | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |