LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old January 5th 04, 03:41 AM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Keith wrote:
"My dipole on 40m was only 35-40 ft. Not 1/2-wave up. But not once did
it ever beat my vertical long haul."

I believe Mark. The scales may be tilted in the favor of Mark`s vertical
by the high-conductivity soil at Mark`s QTH.

Commercial stations spend what it takes to put those horizontal antennas
up at elevations which bring the take-off angle down low enough to reach
out the distance to the target area.

At high elevation, a dipole becomes bidirectional in azimuth. This gain
is often enhanced by a reflector, directors, extended element lengths,
or additional in-phase elements. Curtain arrays are popular transmitting
antennas. So are rhombics, especially for point-to-point, for both
transmission and reception.

Receiving antenna farms rely on rhombics, Beverages, fishbones, etc,
where the object is directivity and gain to give S/N, if not efficiency.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Measuring radiation resistance Reg Edwards Antenna 11 December 13th 03 12:51 PM
RF radiation detector harshit Antenna 7 December 3rd 03 12:59 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017