![]() |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
this is the first more complex (than s38s) halli have i tried to
repair. as received, the set. set played, but w/out sensitivity or vol. recapped (not micas) and tested all tubes, replacing as needed. checked resistors, and replaced a few. set also had severe crackling which matched 'short in a tuning cap' as described in marcus and levy. i replaced the tuning condensor, due to remaining crackles i simply couldn't get out w/cleaning. crackles went away w/partswap and set appeared to align well -- used scope across output to voice coil. got good volume and nice waves as i went thru the IF and the band steps. for IF the sig gen was connected to the center of the gang, the middle of 3 posts on the top of it, w/the ground to the chassis and the gang fully open. radio plays well on band 3 -- good vol on strong station, many stations w/short wire. picks up similarly on band 2 down to about 4 mhz. bc is silent except for what sounds like a couple of spots that 'want to be' stations. very faint voice heard in one spot. band 4 seems to be similar. a quick reattach of sig gen, and good tones heard all bands at align freq for those bands, and good IF tone. bandswitch was checked and cleaned. seems to be making good contact w/clean click/pop as changed w/set on. a little puzzled where to look because of this. docs say make sure the image freq is out of the way of oscillator freq for bands. i don't quite understand what this means, or how to be sure they aren't colliding, but i think i may have misaligned the base IF? maybe aligned with an image of it? have noticed when aligning other sets, you can find several positions that ring w/the tone, but only one that rings best. is this the result of getting the echo instead of the original? care was taken on the rf aligns to find thru most of the adj range for the best response. but did not try moving the if's radically. ab |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
"ablebravo" wrote in message
ups.com... this is the first more complex (than s38s) halli have i tried to repair. as received, the set. set played, but w/out sensitivity or vol. recapped (not micas) and tested all tubes, replacing as needed. checked resistors, and replaced a few. set also had severe crackling which matched 'short in a tuning cap' as described in marcus and levy. i replaced the tuning condensor, due to remaining crackles i simply couldn't get out w/cleaning. crackles went away w/partswap and set appeared to align well -- used scope across output to voice coil. got good volume and nice waves as i went thru the IF and the band steps. for IF the sig gen was connected to the center of the gang, the middle of 3 posts on the top of it, w/the ground to the chassis and the gang fully open. radio plays well on band 3 -- good vol on strong station, many stations w/short wire. picks up similarly on band 2 down to about 4 mhz. bc is silent except for what sounds like a couple of spots that 'want to be' stations. very faint voice heard in one spot. band 4 seems to be similar. a quick reattach of sig gen, and good tones heard all bands at align freq for those bands, and good IF tone. bandswitch was checked and cleaned. seems to be making good contact w/clean click/pop as changed w/set on. a little puzzled where to look because of this. docs say make sure the image freq is out of the way of oscillator freq for bands. i don't quite understand what this means, or how to be sure they aren't colliding, but i think i may have misaligned the base IF? maybe aligned with an image of it? have noticed when aligning other sets, you can find several positions that ring w/the tone, but only one that rings best. is this the result of getting the echo instead of the original? care was taken on the rf aligns to find thru most of the adj range for the best response. but did not try moving the if's radically. ab First, carefully clean the band switch wafer metal wipers with a cotton Q-tip and some DeOxit. No need for heavy handiness here -- just good patient (methodical) cleaning. IF you are short on time or not patient that day -- do something else and come back to it. gb |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
have done, 3 times, just as you say. the fingers seems to make good
contact (rise and fall as the switch is cycled). i can certainly do again. i guess what i don't get is how i can get a nice signal thru w/the gen -- tune the test signal and its images, but not tune stations. i don't have a whole lot of experience w/this. ab First, carefully clean the band switch wafer metal wipers with a cotton Q-tip and some DeOxit. No need for heavy handiness here -- just good patient (methodical) cleaning. IF you are short on time or not patient that day -- do something else and come back to it. gb |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
ablebravo wrote:
have done, 3 times, just as you say. the fingers seems to make good contact (rise and fall as the switch is cycled). i can certainly do again. i guess what i don't get is how i can get a nice signal thru w/the gen -- tune the test signal and its images, but not tune stations. i don't have a whole lot of experience w/this. ab First, carefully clean the band switch wafer metal wipers with a cotton Q-tip and some DeOxit. No need for heavy handiness here -- just good patient (methodical) cleaning. IF you are short on time or not patient that day -- do something else and come back to it. gb Perhaps you are simply trying to receive stations on bands for which there is poor propagation during that particular time of day.... jak |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
I believe your antenna coil is open...Look at schematic and find
BC band coil,check continuity from ant post to ground... coil is probably open..This sometimes happens when lightning sends a surge via an external antenna,burns out the ant coil on the band that is selected at the time..You may be able to repair the coil if that is the problem...GL HS jakdedert wrote: ablebravo wrote: have done, 3 times, just as you say. the fingers seems to make good contact (rise and fall as the switch is cycled). i can certainly do again. i guess what i don't get is how i can get a nice signal thru w/the gen -- tune the test signal and its images, but not tune stations. i don't have a whole lot of experience w/this. ab First, carefully clean the band switch wafer metal wipers with a cotton Q-tip and some DeOxit. No need for heavy handiness here -- just good patient (methodical) cleaning. IF you are short on time or not patient that day -- do something else and come back to it. gb Perhaps you are simply trying to receive stations on bands for which there is poor propagation during that particular time of day.... jak |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
I believe your antenna coil is open...Look at schematic and find
BC band coil,check continuity from ant post to ground... coil is probably open..This sometimes happens when lightning sends a surge via an external antenna,burns out the ant coil on the band that is selected at the time..You may be able to repair the coil if that is the problem...GL HS jakdedert wrote: ablebravo wrote: have done, 3 times, just as you say. the fingers seems to make good contact (rise and fall as the switch is cycled). i can certainly do again. i guess what i don't get is how i can get a nice signal thru w/the gen -- tune the test signal and its images, but not tune stations. i don't have a whole lot of experience w/this. ab First, carefully clean the band switch wafer metal wipers with a cotton Q-tip and some DeOxit. No need for heavy handiness here -- just good patient (methodical) cleaning. IF you are short on time or not patient that day -- do something else and come back to it. gb Perhaps you are simply trying to receive stations on bands for which there is poor propagation during that particular time of day.... jak |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
I believe your antenna coil is open...Look at schematic and find
BC band coil,check continuity from ant post to ground... coil is probably open..This sometimes happens when lightning sends a surge via an external antenna,burns out the ant coil on the band that is selected at the time..You may be able to repair the coil if that is the problem...GL HS jakdedert wrote: ablebravo wrote: have done, 3 times, just as you say. the fingers seems to make good contact (rise and fall as the switch is cycled). i can certainly do again. i guess what i don't get is how i can get a nice signal thru w/the gen -- tune the test signal and its images, but not tune stations. i don't have a whole lot of experience w/this. ab First, carefully clean the band switch wafer metal wipers with a cotton Q-tip and some DeOxit. No need for heavy handiness here -- just good patient (methodical) cleaning. IF you are short on time or not patient that day -- do something else and come back to it. gb Perhaps you are simply trying to receive stations on bands for which there is poor propagation during that particular time of day.... jak |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
checked against a zenith transoceanic, same bands same time of day. i
guess a better phrasing would be, 'could misalignment (image maybe) cause these problems. i will check the coil, but suspect ok. before pulling the old tuner cap, could receive bc outside the areas it was crackling on. ab jakdedert wrote: ablebravo wrote: have done, 3 times, just as you say. the fingers seems to make good contact (rise and fall as the switch is cycled). i can certainly do again. i guess what i don't get is how i can get a nice signal thru w/the gen -- tune the test signal and its images, but not tune stations. i don't have a whole lot of experience w/this. ab First, carefully clean the band switch wafer metal wipers with a cotton Q-tip and some DeOxit. No need for heavy handiness here -- just good patient (methodical) cleaning. IF you are short on time or not patient that day -- do something else and come back to it. gb Perhaps you are simply trying to receive stations on bands for which there is poor propagation during that particular time of day.... jak |
Hallicrafters S-40A, bad band(s)
"ablebravo" wrote in message
oups.com... have done, 3 times, just as you say. the fingers seems to make good contact (rise and fall as the switch is cycled). i can certainly do again. i guess what i don't get is how i can get a nice signal thru w/the gen -- tune the test signal and its images, but not tune stations. i don't have a whole lot of experience w/this. ab Well if you removed visible tarnish (brown or black) you are then likely okay in that department. You have performed the alignment, right? gb |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
"ablebravo" wrote in message
ups.com... this is the first more complex (than s38s) halli have i tried to repair. as received, the set. set played, but w/out sensitivity or volume ... [snip]. docs say make sure the image freq is out of the way of oscillator freq for bands. i don't quite understand what this means, or how to be sure they aren't colliding, but i think i may have misaligned the base IF? maybe aligned with an image of it? have noticed when aligning other sets, you can find several positions that ring w/the tone, but only one that rings best. is this the result of getting the echo instead of the original? care was taken on the rf aligns to find thru most of the adj range for the best response. but did not try moving the if's radically. ab Yes, after I reread your first post -- you may have aligned this incorrectly Bruce McCalley has a good article on this subject for restorers http://www.antiqueradios.org/gazette/align.htm OR it may be .... http://www.burnyourbonus.net/rec.rad...thread306.html http://bama.sbc.edu/hallicra.htm I would suggest looking at these S-40A web pages (and owners who have also performed major restorations and alignments on this model) Phillip I. Nelson (a good documentation restorer) http://antiqueradio.org/halli02.htm VE7SL http://imagenisp.ca/jsm/s40.html "A close inspection of the BFO circuit indicated a previous but unsuccessful repair attempt. As the Hallicrafter's engineers often liked to do in BFO circuits, a gimmick capacitor consisting of two short twisted wires was used to couple the BFO signal into the detector. This particular S-40 had one of the two wires soldered to the correct tube pin but the other one (to twist together with) was not to be found. Examining the tube pin showed no indication that there ever had been a second wire as the solder was smooth, original and undisturbed. The one wire that was installed showed no indication of ever being twisted with another. It is likely that the BFO circuit on radio 12,733 never did work, right off the Rogers Majestic assembly line in Toronto. Perhaps it was wired or tested very late on a Friday afternoon, back in 1947! " http://portabletubes.co.uk/boats/hs40.htm |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
yep using bama copy halli s40a service guide. have sams. reread phil
for first 4 sets i did. will read bruce w/interest, but some over my head. think i will retry if align since cleaned band again w/no change. band rotors look pretty good. have located the band 1 related coils and will try to figure out how to test for opens....4 solderpoints per coil.... not sure which should be connected to meter. thank you all for your patience and advice ab |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
"ablebravo" wrote in message
ups.com... yep using bama copy halli s40a service guide. have sams. reread phil for first 4 sets i did. will read bruce w/interest, but some over my head. think i will retry if align since cleaned band again w/no change. band rotors look pretty good. have located the band 1 related coils and will try to figure out how to test for opens....4 solderpoints per coil.... not sure which should be connected to meter. thank you all for your patience and advice ab Richard reminded me of one other point .. check you coils in the BC (band 1). Phil found bad capacitors in some of these sections or inside cans (great way to ruin the day) ... finding and replacing resolved his sensitivity and peaking. Note that many have commented that sensitivity was lousy (compared to what?) on band 1. gb |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
thx richard. esp on how to test the coils. i will do that before
checking the IF again. i am suspecting the IF because a couple of the adjustments were near the travel limit, which may mean i am in wrong place. where it works, it's hot. i was pretty sure on the tuning gang -- could adjust the vanes and get the crackle to change and nearly disappear. i flushed it good, blew it out and cleaned and cleaned. after spending hours on it, i bought the part. i think something might have been in the bearings. in the 'crackle spot' the signal died and set could not be aligned. it blotted out some of the align freqs. no such prob w/replacement part. ab |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
"ablebravo" wrote in message ups.com... thx richard. esp on how to test the coils. i will do that before checking the IF again. i am suspecting the IF because a couple of the adjustments were near the travel limit, which may mean i am in wrong place. where it works, it's hot. i was pretty sure on the tuning gang -- could adjust the vanes and get the crackle to change and nearly disappear. i flushed it good, blew it out and cleaned and cleaned. after spending hours on it, i bought the part. i think something might have been in the bearings. in the 'crackle spot' the signal died and set could not be aligned. it blotted out some of the align freqs. no such prob w/replacement part. ab Do you have a signal generator of some sort? I thought from your posts that you do. You really do need one to set up the IF amplifiers. It should be capable of putting out 455 khz preferably with some modulation. The usual requirement is for 400hz at about 30%. The modulation level is not critical but most signal generators are not capable of high modulation level. Its also helpful to have a crystal calibrator, preferably one which puts out fairly low frequency markers in addition to higher frequency ones. 10khz is nice to have. Mine has 100khz, 1.0 mhz, and 10mhz. This can be used directly to calibrate the receiver and also to calibrate the signal generator. If you don't have these tools perhaps you can borrow them. If the IF transformers are near the limit of their adjustment, and you know the test frequency is correct, its probable the resonating capacitors have drifted in value. I believe this receiver uses permeablility tuned IF coils (asjustable dust cores). Again, since the problem seems to be isolated to two bands and at least one band works OK I think the IF is not at fault, or at least not the main cause of trouble. I suggest checking the wiring of the tuning capacitor again to make sure its OK. You might want to check the other capacitors in the oscillator and RF stage. I am suspicious of the oscillator because you say it quits near the low end of one band. That sound to me like a bad coupling capacitor there. If you have access to a good RF voltmeter or reasonably wide band oscilloscope you can check the output of the oscillator. Even a pick-up loop will show if the output is varying a lot or if the LO is quitting at the low end of a band. Just some things to look for. Remember, this RX is more than fifty years old so it may have a lot of tired parts (so do I). -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
thanks again, richard. i am printing this whole train out to go down
everyone's checklists. yes, i have an eico sig gen,almost as old as the set. i check it against an aor 8200 scanner set for the target freq at each alignment. it is usually really close to right on the money. have an old tek 465b 200mhz, which is still something of a mystery, but i can use it in simple ways. i think i can find the output. tube-tested the mixer/osci tube itself, and again got ok. have also an eico signal tracer, but have only read a bit about how to use. i do plan to check the tuning cap wiring. i did redo the solder joints, and while i did photo and mark the wires as the old came out, i could have made a mistake. it should be easy to undo and jumper to check -- mistake would have to be in center gang area. wires not long enough to grossly change where they go. it will take me a while to go thru all this -- thank you all. ab Richard Knoppow wrote: "ablebravo" wrote in message ups.com... thx richard. esp on how to test the coils. i will do that before checking the IF again. i am suspecting the IF because a couple of the adjustments were near the travel limit, which may mean i am in wrong place. where it works, it's hot. i was pretty sure on the tuning gang -- could adjust the vanes and get the crackle to change and nearly disappear. i flushed it good, blew it out and cleaned and cleaned. after spending hours on it, i bought the part. i think something might have been in the bearings. in the 'crackle spot' the signal died and set could not be aligned. it blotted out some of the align freqs. no such prob w/replacement part. ab Do you have a signal generator of some sort? I thought from your posts that you do. You really do need one to set up the IF amplifiers. It should be capable of putting out 455 khz preferably with some modulation. The usual requirement is for 400hz at about 30%. The modulation level is not critical but most signal generators are not capable of high modulation level. Its also helpful to have a crystal calibrator, preferably one which puts out fairly low frequency markers in addition to higher frequency ones. 10khz is nice to have. Mine has 100khz, 1.0 mhz, and 10mhz. This can be used directly to calibrate the receiver and also to calibrate the signal generator. If you don't have these tools perhaps you can borrow them. If the IF transformers are near the limit of their adjustment, and you know the test frequency is correct, its probable the resonating capacitors have drifted in value. I believe this receiver uses permeablility tuned IF coils (asjustable dust cores). Again, since the problem seems to be isolated to two bands and at least one band works OK I think the IF is not at fault, or at least not the main cause of trouble. I suggest checking the wiring of the tuning capacitor again to make sure its OK. You might want to check the other capacitors in the oscillator and RF stage. I am suspicious of the oscillator because you say it quits near the low end of one band. That sound to me like a bad coupling capacitor there. If you have access to a good RF voltmeter or reasonably wide band oscilloscope you can check the output of the oscillator. Even a pick-up loop will show if the output is varying a lot or if the LO is quitting at the low end of a band. Just some things to look for. Remember, this RX is more than fifty years old so it may have a lot of tired parts (so do I). -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
"ablebravo" wrote in message ups.com... thanks again, richard. i am printing this whole train out to go down everyone's checklists. yes, i have an eico sig gen,almost as old as the set. i check it against an aor 8200 scanner set for the target freq at each alignment. it is usually really close to right on the money. have an old tek 465b 200mhz, which is still something of a mystery, but i can use it in simple ways. i think i can find the output. tube-tested the mixer/osci tube itself, and again got ok. have also an eico signal tracer, but have only read a bit about how to use. i do plan to check the tuning cap wiring. i did redo the solder joints, and while i did photo and mark the wires as the old came out, i could have made a mistake. it should be easy to undo and jumper to check -- mistake would have to be in center gang area. wires not long enough to grossly change where they go. it will take me a while to go thru all this -- thank you all. ab Richard Knoppow wrote: "ablebravo" wrote in message ups.com... thx richard. esp on how to test the coils. i will do Long thread snipped... If you need a handbook for the Tek 465-B there is one on the BAMA site at: http://bama.sbc.edu/tektroni.htm And for Eico instruments at: http://bama.sbc.edu/eico.htm This is a very good site to bookmark. The signal tracer is a wide band amplifier with a detector on it. You can probe around in the circuit to find out what is there. That and the scope are powerful tools for analysing exactly this sort of problem. You can use the scope with either a high impedance probe or a simple pick-up loop to look at the oscillator output. The look will cause the least disturbance to the circuit you are measuring. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
i think you have nailed at least part of it -- rf stage. i have
emailed you offline details. had a completely dead rf amp tube, ahead of the IF stage. this apparently forced a pretty severe tuning compensation that affected the bands (?). all tubes tested before starting work, but this one croaked sometime during repairs. found intermittent black speaker lead and fixed. was cutting out also. so there's some of it. already better w/if and bfo align redone. will see what gives after i finish all rf again... hopefully it will come back into line on all bands. yes i go first to bama for all. bookmarked on about 4 computers i have. ab Richard Knoppow wrote: "ablebravo" wrote in message ups.com... thx richard. esp on how to test the coils. i will do Long thread snipped... If you need a handbook for the Tek 465-B there is one on the BAMA site at: http://bama.sbc.edu/tektroni.htm And for Eico instruments at: http://bama.sbc.edu/eico.htm This is a very good site to bookmark. The signal tracer is a wide band amplifier with a detector on it. You can probe around in the circuit to find out what is there. That and the scope are powerful tools for analysing exactly this sort of problem. You can use the scope with either a high impedance probe or a simple pick-up loop to look at the oscillator output. The look will cause the least disturbance to the circuit you are measuring. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
all tubes tested before starting work, but this one
croaked sometime during repairs. I just picked up on this thread and read it with interest. Sounds like you're on the right track. That's a nice receiver when working correctly. One thing I'm beginning to appreciate about fixing old radios & TVs is that some components which test "good" or seem acceptable at first, may decide to give out after a few more hours of operation. The tube (or whatever) may simply have reached the end of its service life, or perhaps it croaked after running at full power for the first time in decades. Before I declare victory on any project, I run it on the workbench for some hours. Much better to find and correct those latent issues now, rather than later. Have fun, Phil Nelson Phil's Old Radios http://antiqueradio.org/index.html |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
"Phil Nelson" wrote in message ... all tubes tested before starting work, but this one croaked sometime during repairs. I just picked up on this thread and read it with interest. Sounds like you're on the right track. That's a nice receiver when working correctly. One thing I'm beginning to appreciate about fixing old radios & TVs is that some components which test "good" or seem acceptable at first, may decide to give out after a few more hours of operation. The tube (or whatever) may simply have reached the end of its service life, or perhaps it croaked after running at full power for the first time in decades. Before I declare victory on any project, I run it on the workbench for some hours. Much better to find and correct those latent issues now, rather than later. Have fun, Phil Nelson Phil's Old Radios http://antiqueradio.org/index.html Its possible for tubes to have bad seals or very slight cracks that allow some air to get in. The "getter", which is the silver stuff on the inside, can absorb only so much air after which the tube will simply not operate. Sometimes the symptom is a blue glow inside the tube, something like the glow in a voltage regulator tube. This should not be confused with the slight dark blue glow somtimes seen in beam power tubes with very high voltage on the plates. This is not due to air and is normal. It is also pretty common for resistors and, especially capacitors, to die after being unused for a long time. There are many causes, moisture absorption and others. Even transformers may die shortly after being fired up after being unused for a long time. A useful tool when working on old equipment is a metered variable transformer. Ideally, it should have both a voltage and current meter on the output. The current meter is especially important since it will show excessive current before damage is done. My suggestion is to remove rectifier tubes from the equipment and bring it up slowly on the transformer. If there is any sign of excessive current turn it off immediately. If it looks OK this way try again with the rectifiers, again bringing the voltage up slowly. Of course, the filter capacitors should be checked first for shorts. Most electronic equpment likes to run. Leaving it off and in storage for long periods is not good for it. I suspect nearly everyone who follows this group already knows all this stuff. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
hallicrafters s-40a, bad band(s)
hi phil -- i have read, reread, and printed a good bit of your site. i
think i actually got the link to this forum there as well. i couldn't get by w/help of yourself and the others here who are good enough to invest the time.... ab Phil Nelson wrote: all tubes tested before starting work, but this one croaked sometime during repairs. I just picked up on this thread and read it with interest. Sounds like you're on the right track. That's a nice receiver when working correctly. One thing I'm beginning to appreciate about fixing old radios & TVs is that some components which test "good" or seem acceptable at first, may decide to give out after a few more hours of operation. The tube (or whatever) may simply have reached the end of its service life, or perhaps it croaked after running at full power for the first time in decades. Before I declare victory on any project, I run it on the workbench for some hours. Much better to find and correct those latent issues now, rather than later. Have fun, Phil Nelson Phil's Old Radios http://antiqueradio.org/index.html |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com