Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
"John Smith I" wrote in message ... John Smith I wrote: To Whom It May Concern: Just so you have a complete picture of Paul W. Schleck, I took the following from one of his posts in news.groups.proposals: ... Now that just speaks volumes about this man, his caliber, his "ethical standards", etc. Now, doesn't it? Gawd! I feel sick ... Warmest regards, JS Unbelievable, is there ANYONE here who believes Mr. Schlock... err, Mr. Schleck would be "fair" and just to ALL? That he would consider ANYTHING other than his own petty gripes and bitches? If so, step right up here to defend the man, I am waiting ... My gawd, the man is so crooked he makes my dogs hind legs look straight! Regards, JS Schleck is all about self-aggrandizement. His posts are all about himself. Read his posts, the few that he sends. Paul is convinced that he, and only he, has true insight into Ham matters and that he, Paul Schleck, knows better than us, the Great Unwashed. Does the term, "Stuffed Shirt" come to mind? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
Wodger wrote:
... Schleck is all about self-aggrandizement. His posts are all about himself. Read his posts, the few that he sends. Paul is convinced that he, and only he, has true insight into Ham matters and that he, Paul Schleck, knows better than us, the Great Unwashed. Does the term, "Stuffed Shirt" come to mind? Wodger: ABSOLUTELY! And, he is much, much more. That bit of his just took the GREATEST LIAR I have ever known and made that liar look like nothing ... Schleck is good alright, the man has brass b*lls the size of basketballs, and his little trolling bunch of henchmen are sickening--strange they ALL seem to have extra licenses, isn't it? Course, he just "swore" to the committee that they would not be "unfair" or "judgmental", what a GREAT FARCE! Warmest regards, JS |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
"John Smith I" wrote in message ... Wodger wrote: ... Schleck is all about self-aggrandizement. His posts are all about himself. Read his posts, the few that he sends. Paul is convinced that he, and only he, has true insight into Ham matters and that he, Paul Schleck, knows better than us, the Great Unwashed. Does the term, "Stuffed Shirt" come to mind? Wodger: ABSOLUTELY! And, he is much, much more. That bit of his just took the GREATEST LIAR I have ever known and made that liar look like nothing ... Schleck is good alright, the man has brass b*lls the size of basketballs, and his little trolling bunch of henchmen are sickening--strange they ALL seem to have extra licenses, isn't it? Course, he just "swore" to the committee that they would not be "unfair" or "judgmental", what a GREAT FARCE! Warmest regards, JS As of this point in time you have no proof of that. Let us see what happens first. Dee, N8UZE |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
Dee Flint wrote:
... As of this point in time you have no proof of that. Let us see what happens first. Dee, N8UZE Dee: I live in California, we have rattlesnakes here. Due to the nature of snakes, I don't have to "see what happens first", the snake is a snake due to the nature of that snake--that snake cannot change his nature ... Regards, JS |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
"John Smith I" wrote in message ... Dee Flint wrote: ... As of this point in time you have no proof of that. Let us see what happens first. Dee, N8UZE Dee: I live in California, we have rattlesnakes here. Due to the nature of snakes, I don't have to "see what happens first", the snake is a snake due to the nature of that snake--that snake cannot change his nature ... Regards, JS Sufficient data already exists on the poison content of rattlesnakes. In addition, don't lump all snakes with rattlesnakes. The common garter snake is quite harmless. Dee, N8UZE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
"Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "John Smith I" wrote in message ... Dee Flint wrote: ... As of this point in time you have no proof of that. Let us see what happens first. Dee, N8UZE Dee: I live in California, we have rattlesnakes here. Due to the nature of snakes, I don't have to "see what happens first", the snake is a snake due to the nature of that snake--that snake cannot change his nature ... Regards, JS Sufficient data already exists on the poison content of rattlesnakes. In addition, don't lump all snakes with rattlesnakes. The common garter snake is quite harmless. Dee, N8UZE In addition, the rattlesnake forms a useful role in keeping rodents and other small vermin under control. Sensible people leave them alone and make sure that the snakes don't come into their immediate area. Dee, N8UZE |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
Dee Flint wrote:
... In addition, the rattlesnake forms a useful role in keeping rodents and other small vermin under control. Sensible people leave them alone and make sure that the snakes don't come into their immediate area. Dee, N8UZE Dee: EXCELLENT advice! I can see you are accustomed to dealing with such. Warmest regards, JS |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
"Dee Flint" wrote in message . .. "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "John Smith I" wrote in message ... Dee Flint wrote: ... As of this point in time you have no proof of that. Let us see what happens first. Dee, N8UZE Dee: I live in California, we have rattlesnakes here. Due to the nature of snakes, I don't have to "see what happens first", the snake is a snake due to the nature of that snake--that snake cannot change his nature .... Regards, JS Sufficient data already exists on the poison content of rattlesnakes. In addition, don't lump all snakes with rattlesnakes. The common garter snake is quite harmless. Dee, N8UZE In addition, the rattlesnake forms a useful role in keeping rodents and other small vermin under control. Sensible people leave them alone and make sure that the snakes don't come into their immediate area. Dee, N8UZE Yes, sensible people avoid rattlesnakes and have nothing to do with them. That is why Paul's proposed moderated group will fall flat on its face within six weeks of going on line. The man is a self-centered blowhard. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
Dee Flint wrote:
... Sufficient data already exists on the poison content of rattlesnakes. In addition, don't lump all snakes with rattlesnakes. The common garter snake is quite harmless. Dee, N8UZE Dee: I appreciate your sense of humor, you are a welcome and pleasant addition to my morning cup of coffee. Sundays are always a bit boring here, diversion is enjoyed Warmest regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Antenna | |||
David Icke - Total Schlock | Shortwave |