Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Teske wrote:
I used to manage operations for the military that used R-390s in vast quantities. It was not uncommon to have over a hundred of them at a facility and thousands in our overall inventory. For what they were designed to do they did a great job. As is mentioned they did not have a product detector. I once saw a prototype sideband adapter, but before it was adopted in any number, we went to newer solid state receivers (none in the ham price category... 10K each and up.] There was a military sideband adaptor available using sheet-beam tubes, although I forget the nomenclature. There also were a lot of civilian models that will work as well. There were a couple problems we had with R-390's. The main one was maintenance. The tuning scheme was so complicated you practically had to be a mechanical engineer to fix one. The gear trains to control the permeability tuning are a wonder to behold. They were cumbersome to tune and military intercept operators who used them all day long complained of "R-390" wrist because it took so much arm torque to change the megahertz dial. It was time consuming to get from one end of the spectrum to a different end. Some guys, particularly HF search operators got carpal tunnel from tuning them day in and day out. They consumed a lot of energy, particularly if you had a bunch of them operating at the same time. We usually had air handlers to cool the rooms they were in. The only reason they didn't drift is because ours were on all the time. They are phenomenally stable by the standards of the day, and the short term stability is actually better than some PLL receivers today. The audio quality is pretty bad, though, and the mechanical filters on the 390A that are a godsend for pulling signals out of the noise floor also contribute to severe ear fatigue because of the enormous group delay. I get a headache listening day in and day out. Of course a ham restorer dealing with unit quantities doesn't have the maintenance management problems we had because a ham trying to fix up one or two can probably scrounge up the parts or cannibalize another like units, but we had to look at the R-390 and almost any other piece of gear the military used in terms of life cycle support, personnel costs, training tails, depot stockpiling and a host of other issues. It was a good receiver that just wasn't supportable anymore. The same could be said for the SP-600 series which was actually obsolete when I entered the profession 43 years ago, but that hasn't stopped dedicated hams from making them work in unit quantities. The good news is that Chuck Rippel's shop down in Chesapeake looks like the Ft. Devens radio refit facility did thirty years back. He has racks and racks of 390s in for repair, and he has all the special tooling and jigs for module testing. So you still have the depot level support that the military provided, it's just that Chuck is providing it now. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: $10> GENERAL RADIO TYPE No. 1803-B VACUUM TUBE VOLTMETER NR | Equipment | |||
FA: Amplex Model "C" Tube Type Radio - Antique Type - Quite Old | Swap | |||
FA=GENERAL RADIO type 722-DS9 VARIABLE CAP-NEW are $11K? | Equipment | |||
General Coverage Attic Antenna Suggestions ? | Shortwave | |||
General Coverage Attic Antenna Suggestions ? | Antenna |