![]() |
|
Hammond 1670
Can anyone with an older reference list inform me what the specs of this power transformer are? Thanks, Steve / VE7SL |
Hammond 1670
Are you sure that this is a power tx ? My catalogue lists the 1600 series
as outputs for various impedances.. VE7AFN. "jsm" wrote in message ... Can anyone with an older reference list inform me what the specs of this power transformer are? Thanks, Steve / VE7SL |
Hammond 1670
No I'm not certain Miki...perhaps it is an AF plate xfrmr? Steve Are you sure that this is a power tx ? My catalogue lists the 1600 series as outputs for various impedances.. VE7AFN. "jsm" wrote in message ... Can anyone with an older reference list inform me what the specs of this power transformer are? Thanks, Steve / VE7SL |
Hammond 1670
My catalogue is probably 25 years old and has listings for audio
output transformers up to No. 1668. Do you have a center-tapped primary and the various output impedances showing continuity amongst themselves ? (but insulated from the promary) miki. .. Steve McDonald" wrote in message ... No I'm not certain Miki...perhaps it is an AF plate xfrmr? Steve Are you sure that this is a power tx ? My catalogue lists the 1600 series as outputs for various impedances.. VE7AFN. "jsm" wrote in message ... Can anyone with an older reference list inform me what the specs of this power transformer are? Thanks, Steve / VE7SL |
Hammond 1670
In article ,
miki wrote: My catalogue is probably 25 years old and has listings for audio output transformers up to No. 1668. Do you have a center-tapped primary and the various output impedances showing continuity amongst themselves ? (but insulated from the promary) miki. If you are sure this is a broadband audio transformer, get your scope and a 1KC square wave generator (the calibration generator on the Tek scope is probably good enough. Pick one winding, and apply the square wave, then pick another winding and look at it on the scope. Apply shunt resistance across the scope probe until you see a nice square wave with only a tiny overshoot. Now you know the impedance of one winding. Do this repeatedly and figure the winding impedance of all of them. From this you should be able to figure out what is intended as the primary and what is intended as the secondary, if you have a vague idea of the intended application. Now, you can put 6.3V AC across the primary through a capacitor, then look at the secondary on a scope. Use a bench supply to add some DC offset to the primary, and keep craking the DC voltage up until you see the level of the sine wave on the output start to drop off. NOW you know the level of acceptable DC offset current before the core saturates at near-zero power, from which you can fudge a full-power value. These are the two important things you want to know about an audio transformer. Power level is a little harder but you can just apply 60 Hz into a big load resistor until the transformer saturates. Full power fresponse tests will require an amp, though. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Hammond 1670
Miki - the output is a single center-tapped winding only. Steve |
Hammond 1670
OK. I've gone as far as I can go. Why not ask the factory ?
http://www.hammondmfg.com miki. "jsm" wrote in message ... Miki - the output is a single center-tapped winding only. Steve |
Hammond 1670
Crap Miki !! I looked again (third time now) just to make sure of the number. It is actually a 167Q...a little tiny tail on the Q, the *******s. Sorry for so much trouble...gonna have to get quad-focals as these tri-focals obviously not up to Hammond standard :-) Steve |
Hammond 1670
"jsm" ) writes:
Crap Miki !! I looked again (third time now) just to make sure of the number. It is actually a 167Q...a little tiny tail on the Q, the *******s. Sorry for so much trouble...gonna have to get quad-focals as these tri-focals obviously not up to Hammond standard :-) Steve From your first post, I thought "167" is what a lot of their power transformers started with. The catalog I have from about 1972 doesn't even list any "1670's". You'll be disappointed though. I see no straight 167Q. But, there is a 167Q5, which is 5v at 6amps. There is a 167Q6, which is 6.3v at 6amps. There is a 167Q12, 12.6v at 13.6 amps. And there is a 167Q14, which is 14v at 6amps. Obviously the "Q" must denote 6amps, at the number following the "Q" is the voltage. It's no wonder the number seemed familiar. I have some in the basement. The large secondary windings are the giveaway. Michael VE2BVW |
Hammond 1670
GROAN miki.
"jsm" wrote in message ... Crap Miki !! I looked again (third time now) just to make sure of the number. It is actually a 167Q...a little tiny tail on the Q, the *******s. Sorry for so much trouble...gonna have to get quad-focals as these tri-focals obviously not up to Hammond standard :-) Steve |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com