Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
terryS ) writes:
On May 12, 7:56 pm, "Antonio Vernucci" wrote: Thanks for answers Tony I0JX But I've also read that the variuos 'command' receivers (BC453, 454 etc,) will work well with much lower B+ voltages. Which are much kinder on the 60 year old decoupling capacitors etc. can't remember the value but could it have been as low as 120 volts DC? I can't say that I've seen that applied to Command sets specifically, but it's not an unknown concept. IN 1970, there was a two-part article by Fred Brown about updating an HRO receiver. He replaced the full size tubes with more modern equivalents, did some other changes, and ran it at a lower voltage than originally. He gave all kinds of reasons for the lower plate voltage, and mentioned that the Collins S-line receiver used lower plate voltage. I think it was that article where he said the only disadvantage was lower audio output. Michael VE2BVW Cos it occurs to me that one could use a 150 volt gas regulator tube (OD3?) on the output of a power supply to achieve that? |