![]() |
HQ-145 Opinions?
I have an HQ-145X that I recapped a few years ago. I've not listened to it recently but remember that back when it was new I was rather disappointed by its mediocre stability on CW. But I was very happy with my HQ-110, which was a good ham receiver for its time. In article BJ4mQCBKg9HM-pn2-umr5iZPzNdyp@localhost, "Count Floyd" wrote: I am getting a Hammarlund HQ-145 and would like to get some of the groups opinions on the radio, compared to the competition at the time. I am looking forward to getting the radio, as a kid in jr. high, my dream was always an HQ-180! Thanks in advance |
HQ-145 Opinions?
I have restored a 140X and I live it. Use it mostly on 160, 80 and 40 as
well as casual SW listening. -- Carl WA1KPD Visit My Boatanchor Collection at http://home.comcast.net/~chnord/wa1kpd.html "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message m... "Count Floyd" wrote in message news:BJ4mQCBKg9HM-pn2-umr5iZPzNdyp@localhost... I am getting a Hammarlund HQ-145 and would like to get some of the groups opinions on the radio, compared to the competition at the time. I am looking forward to getting the radio, as a kid in jr. high, my dream was always an HQ-180! Thanks in advance -- Oh, dear, I need to be more careful. I was writing about the HQ-140X, not the 145 although some of the stuff applies. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com