RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Boatanchors (https://www.radiobanter.com/boatanchors/)
-   -   3395 AM Filter (https://www.radiobanter.com/boatanchors/140814-3395-am-filter.html)

[email protected] February 10th 09 03:14 AM

3395 AM Filter
 
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold

Michael Black[_2_] February 10th 09 05:02 AM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, wrote:

Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold

I thought they stuck with the same IF through the SB line. Or maybe
there was a shift, I seem to recall an article in QST where someone
changed the filter in an early Heathkit SSB transmitter and they had
to make some changes because the then current IF frequency was somewhat
different.

For AM, there's probably a lot more possibilities. Pull some ceramic
filters out of a CB set and cascade them, though those will be at
455KHz. All kinds of cordless phones, cb sets, some older cellphones,
49MHz superheterodyne walkie talkies and other consumer items use
double conversion, with the first IF at 10.7MHz (and a wide ceramic
filter there, the type you find in FM broadcast band receivers) and
then a conversion to 455KHz, so they'd supply the needed crystal
for the second conversion.

If you're not stuck on a specific IF frequency, there's bound to
be still lots of AM bandwidth crystal filters floating around, since
after all relatively few were interested in good filters for AM,
while SSB-width filters were very desired.

Michael VE2BVW


Dr. Barry L. Ornitz[_2_] February 10th 09 06:27 AM

3395 AM Filter
 
"Michael Black" wrote in message
ample.net...

For AM, there's probably a lot more possibilities. Pull some ceramic
filters out of a CB set and cascade them, though those will be at
455KHz. All kinds of cordless phones, cb sets, some older cellphones,
49MHz superheterodyne walkie talkies and other consumer items use
double conversion, with the first IF at 10.7MHz (and a wide ceramic
filter there, the type you find in FM broadcast band receivers) and
then a conversion to 455KHz, so they'd supply the needed crystal
for the second conversion.

If you're not stuck on a specific IF frequency, there's bound to
be still lots of AM bandwidth crystal filters floating around, since
after all relatively few were interested in good filters for AM,
while SSB-width filters were very desired.


Digi-Key stocks a number of ceramic and crystal filters that might be
suitable for AM reception for less than $10 each, some for less than $2.
They are willing to sell in small quantity and are one of the better
distributors of electronic parts. Now one of the largest distributors,
they got their start selling kits of parts for an integrated circuit keyer
for hams. See:
http://www.digikey.com/.

--
73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ

[transpose digits to reply]


Scott Dorsey February 10th 09 02:49 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
Dr. Barry L. Ornitz wrote:
"Michael Black" wrote in message
xample.net...

For AM, there's probably a lot more possibilities. Pull some ceramic
filters out of a CB set and cascade them, though those will be at
455KHz. All kinds of cordless phones, cb sets, some older cellphones,
49MHz superheterodyne walkie talkies and other consumer items use
double conversion, with the first IF at 10.7MHz (and a wide ceramic
filter there, the type you find in FM broadcast band receivers) and
then a conversion to 455KHz, so they'd supply the needed crystal
for the second conversion.

If you're not stuck on a specific IF frequency, there's bound to
be still lots of AM bandwidth crystal filters floating around, since
after all relatively few were interested in good filters for AM,
while SSB-width filters were very desired.


Digi-Key stocks a number of ceramic and crystal filters that might be
suitable for AM reception for less than $10 each, some for less than $2.
They are willing to sell in small quantity and are one of the better
distributors of electronic parts. Now one of the largest distributors,
they got their start selling kits of parts for an integrated circuit keyer
for hams. See:
http://www.digikey.com/.


It _might_ be possible to shift the frequency of an existing ceramic filter
up somewhat by judicious file and sandpaper work. I am not sure how much
you can cut it before you screw the geometry up too much for it to work,
though.

If you need a weird frequency like this, though, I would first call ICM
and see if they can make you something at a reasonable price. They have
standard crystals for very cheap and I bet they won't charge much for
filter crystals either.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Tim Wescott February 10th 09 03:55 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:14:44 -0800, wrote:

Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold


You seem to be asking for two different things.

Do you want to homebrew a radio to receive AM, and are looking for some
candidate filters?

Or do you specifically want to build a Heathkit tube rig or use the
Heathkit SSB and CW filters in a rig, and you want an AM filter to match?

If it's the former, then find out who's selling replacement filters (the
name "Fox Tango" floats up to my consciousness) and see what they have.

If it's the latter -- well, the same place may have what you want, or you
may be out of luck (did the Heath rigs _have_ an AM selection? Mine
certainly didn't), or you may have to mix to some other frequency (i.e.
455kHz), filter, and mix back. Note that my SB-201 didn't have an AM
detector, either, so it may be more than just a filter that you need.

--
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Michael Black[_2_] February 10th 09 04:39 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Tim Wescott wrote:


If it's the latter -- well, the same place may have what you want, or you
may be out of luck (did the Heath rigs _have_ an AM selection? Mine
certainly didn't), or you may have to mix to some other frequency (i.e.
455kHz), filter, and mix back. Note that my SB-201 didn't have an AM
detector, either, so it may be more than just a filter that you need.

If they kept the same IF frequency, and I know the SB line did use
something in the 3MHz range, then there was at least one AM filter, for
the shortwave band version of the SB series receiver, the SB-313 or
something.

There was a Heathkit receiver/transmitter set for AM about the time
of their early SSB rigs, same sort of styling as the SSB rig of
the time. The era of the Indian names. I don't know whether those
used a high IF or used the traditional 455KHz, but if it was the
former, they'd surely use the same 3MHz range scheme as the SSB
equpment.

Michael


Tim Wescott February 10th 09 05:36 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:39:29 -0500, Michael Black wrote:

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Tim Wescott wrote:


If it's the latter -- well, the same place may have what you want, or
you may be out of luck (did the Heath rigs _have_ an AM selection?
Mine certainly didn't), or you may have to mix to some other frequency
(i.e. 455kHz), filter, and mix back. Note that my SB-201 didn't have
an AM detector, either, so it may be more than just a filter that you
need.

If they kept the same IF frequency, and I know the SB line did use
something in the 3MHz range, then there was at least one AM filter, for
the shortwave band version of the SB series receiver, the SB-313 or
something.

There was a Heathkit receiver/transmitter set for AM about the time of
their early SSB rigs, same sort of styling as the SSB rig of the time.
The era of the Indian names. I don't know whether those used a high IF
or used the traditional 455KHz, but if it was the former, they'd surely
use the same 3MHz range scheme as the SSB equpment.

Michael


I believe there was a regular brand rig (Kenwood?) of about that era that
also used the same mixing scheme, and had the same frequency fixed IF, if
not all the same matching impedances. I can't really recall, though,
other than I was thumbing through a replacement filter catalog and
noticed it because I had the SB-201.

--
http://www.wescottdesign.com

[email protected] February 10th 09 06:53 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Feb 9, 9:14*pm, " wrote:
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? *TNX 73 *Harold Followup: I am looking for a 3395 KHZ. AM Filter for a Heathkit SB301 .The AM filter was offered as an Option . The SB 301 will not receive AM without the optional filter....It has AM detector and everything but the filter..I thought someone might have worked out a substitute for the Heath filter..like a high Q tuned IF can or whatever... TNX Harold


Michael Black[_2_] February 10th 09 07:00 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Tim Wescott wrote:

I believe there was a regular brand rig (Kenwood?) of about that era that
also used the same mixing scheme, and had the same frequency fixed IF, if
not all the same matching impedances. I can't really recall, though,
other than I was thumbing through a replacement filter catalog and
noticed it because I had the SB-201.

That sounds familiar, though I can't remember which brand it was either.

I just did some searching, and I was thrown off by the mention of "early"
in the first post.

I was thinking of the Heathkit Commanche as a small receiver suitable
for mobile operation, and it was used in tandem with the am Cheyenne
transmitter. A check shows that receiver used a 3MHz IF. The Mohawk,
which was a full blown receiver, used 1682KHz and then down to 50KHz,
obviously not a standard combination in Heathkit receivers. The HR-20
Mobile SSB receiver used a 3MHz IF too. A quick search doesn't turn
up what IF's the matching SSB transmitters were using, but I assume
they too were 3MHz.

So then Heathkit moved to 3395KHz, and that was pretty standard for
a really long time. I think even the HW series of monoband SSB
transceivers used the same frequency, though they used multiple
crystals rather than prebuilt crystal filter.

It's all relative, but I think of "early" as the pre-SB line, not
the SB line itself. Heath kept the SB line going into the seventies,
with cosmetic changes but the same basic design.

Michael VE2BVW


Bill M[_2_] February 10th 09 07:01 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
Tim Wescott wrote:


I believe there was a regular brand rig (Kenwood?) of about that era that
also used the same mixing scheme, and had the same frequency fixed IF, if
not all the same matching impedances. I can't really recall, though,
other than I was thumbing through a replacement filter catalog and
noticed it because I had the SB-201.


My fuzzy recollection says that 3395 shouldn't be difficult to find. A
check of completed auctions on ebay didn't bear that out. I suppose it
depends on how big of a hurry you're in :)

-Bill

Michael Black[_2_] February 10th 09 07:09 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, wrote:

On Feb 9, 9:14*pm, " wrote:
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? *TNX 73 *Harold

Followup: I am looking for a 3395 KHZ. AM Filter for a Heathkit SB301.
The AM filter was offered as an Option . The SB 301 will not receive AM
without the optional filter....It has AM detector and everything but the
filter..I thought someone might have worked out a substitute for the
Heath filter..like a high Q tuned IF can or whatever... TNX Harold


At 3395KHz, LC circuits won't provide enough selectivity. You're either
going to have to find a Heathkit filter for sale, which likely is
going to be hard since the SB line was primarily for SSB so the
optional AM filters would be in scarce supply to begin with, or see
if you can get a more recently manufactured filter, assuming those
third party companies have bothered with AM bandwidth filters.

You could have some crystals ground to the frequency, and try making
a ladder filter. Or get just one, and make one of those old phasing
type crystal filters, which would need loading to get the needed
wide bandwidth, and of course wouldn't provide good skirt selectivity.

You do realize you could do what people did at the time, when SSB-only
rigs starting coming along but AM was still common? Receive using
the SSB receiver, which will chop out the unneeded sideband and
knock the carrier down so it won't be a bother, and then the signal
becomes SSB inside the receiver where the BFO can properly demodulate
it.

Michael VE2BVW



Paul P[_2_] February 11th 09 03:21 AM

3395 AM Filter
 

wrote in message
...
On Feb 9, 9:14 pm, " wrote:
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold Followup: I am looking for a 3395 KHZ.
AM Filter for a Heathkit SB301 .The AM filter was offered as an Option .
The SB 301 will not receive AM without the optional filter....It has AM
detector and everything but the filter..I thought someone might have
worked out a substitute for the Heath filter..like a high Q tuned IF can
or whatever... TNX Harold


I worked on a National NC-300 a few months ago. It had a conversion from a
coil to a crystal at the second converter stage.
About half way down the page: http://www.ppinyot.com/N/national/national.htm
look for the "Second Converter modification at V3 6BE6" paragraph.
Schematics and FNBs are on BAMA.

The crystal used in the NC-300 is not at your frequency. But a crystal
company should be able to make you one. I purchased Hammarlund specific
crystals from http://www.icmfg.com/ The crystals were about 25 bucks each.

AND the woman that answered the phone is not just a receptionist. She knew
exactly which crystals I needed for the Hammarlund and what overtone and
impedance!!! Not that she is a woman but she knew exactly what the vintage
crystal replacement I needed!

I hope this leads you some where.

Paul P.


Michael Black[_2_] February 11th 09 03:47 AM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Paul P wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Feb 9, 9:14 pm, " wrote:
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold Followup: I am looking for a 3395 KHZ.
AM Filter for a Heathkit SB301 .The AM filter was offered as an Option .
The SB 301 will not receive AM without the optional filter....It has AM
detector and everything but the filter..I thought someone might have worked
out a substitute for the Heath filter..like a high Q tuned IF can or
whatever... TNX Harold


I worked on a National NC-300 a few months ago. It had a conversion from a
coil to a crystal at the second converter stage.
About half way down the page: http://www.ppinyot.com/N/national/national.htm
look for the "Second Converter modification at V3 6BE6" paragraph. Schematics
and FNBs are on BAMA.

The crystal used in the NC-300 is not at your frequency. But a crystal
company should be able to make you one. I purchased Hammarlund specific
crystals from http://www.icmfg.com/ The crystals were about 25 bucks each.

AND the woman that answered the phone is not just a receptionist. She knew
exactly which crystals I needed for the Hammarlund and what overtone and
impedance!!! Not that she is a woman but she knew exactly what the vintage
crystal replacement I needed!

Who knows, but likely they have it on computer.

The old crystal manufacturers tended to keep such information around, and
certainly once they had the information because someone had sent it to
them to get a needed crystal ground, they'd surely have kept it. So
after a while, they could just look up the information. If they bothered
to computerize it, then all they'd have to do is type in some search
terms, and out would pop the needed information. That wouldn't require
someone who knew all the details by heart.

Michael VE2BVW

Tim Wescott February 11th 09 04:26 AM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:47:06 -0500, Michael Black wrote:

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Paul P wrote:


wrote in message
news:722c01b0-

...
On Feb 9, 9:14 pm, " wrote:
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold Followup: I am looking for a 3395
KHZ. AM Filter for a Heathkit SB301 .The AM filter was offered as an
Option . The SB 301 will not receive AM without the optional
filter....It has AM detector and everything but the filter..I thought
someone might have worked out a substitute for the Heath filter..like
a high Q tuned IF can or whatever... TNX Harold


I worked on a National NC-300 a few months ago. It had a conversion
from a coil to a crystal at the second converter stage. About half way
down the page:
http://www.ppinyot.com/N/national/national.htm look for
the "Second Converter modification at V3 6BE6" paragraph. Schematics
and FNBs are on BAMA.

The crystal used in the NC-300 is not at your frequency. But a crystal
company should be able to make you one. I purchased Hammarlund
specific crystals from http://www.icmfg.com/ The crystals were about
25 bucks each.

AND the woman that answered the phone is not just a receptionist. She
knew exactly which crystals I needed for the Hammarlund and what
overtone and impedance!!! Not that she is a woman but she knew exactly
what the vintage crystal replacement I needed!

Who knows, but likely they have it on computer.

The old crystal manufacturers tended to keep such information around,
and certainly once they had the information because someone had sent it
to them to get a needed crystal ground, they'd surely have kept it. So
after a while, they could just look up the information. If they
bothered to computerize it, then all they'd have to do is type in some
search terms, and out would pop the needed information. That wouldn't
require someone who knew all the details by heart.

Michael VE2BVW


But, in such a situation having someone willing and able to properly
fondle the keyboard, then cheerfully tell you what you need to know, is
still better than a snide gum-chewing receptionist!

I try not to undervalue order-takers and such. Given how much value they
can add when they're on the ball (and how much they can screw up when
they're not), one cannot dismiss them as "just" anything.

--
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Bill M[_2_] February 11th 09 04:54 AM

3395 AM Filter
 
Tim Wescott wrote:

But, in such a situation having someone willing and able to properly
fondle the keyboard, then cheerfully tell you what you need to know, is
still better than a snide gum-chewing receptionist!

I try not to undervalue order-takers and such. Given how much value they
can add when they're on the ball (and how much they can screw up when
they're not), one cannot dismiss them as "just" anything.


Well, we 'hams' often are not the easiest customers to deal with because
we 'know' more than the gal on the other end of the phone :) That said,
I not so long ago ordered some xtals from JAN and mentioned my old
Harvey-Wells TBS-50 and the gal lit up like she knew what I was talking
about.

JAN has my business ever since.

-Bill

Scott Dorsey February 11th 09 05:21 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
In article ,
Bill M wrote:
Tim Wescott wrote:

But, in such a situation having someone willing and able to properly
fondle the keyboard, then cheerfully tell you what you need to know, is
still better than a snide gum-chewing receptionist!

I try not to undervalue order-takers and such. Given how much value they
can add when they're on the ball (and how much they can screw up when
they're not), one cannot dismiss them as "just" anything.


Well, we 'hams' often are not the easiest customers to deal with because
we 'know' more than the gal on the other end of the phone :) That said,
I not so long ago ordered some xtals from JAN and mentioned my old
Harvey-Wells TBS-50 and the gal lit up like she knew what I was talking
about.

JAN has my business ever since.


ICM and JAN are both this way and they are both absolute joys to deal with.
They know what you want, they know how to make it, and they know what a
fair price is.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

k3hvg February 11th 09 08:32 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
wrote:
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold

For crystals, try MH Electronics, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Been using them
on MIL rigs, many with some pretty high currents. So far, 100%. They
say they use large blank crystals for their HC-6-style units, not those
sub-minis that will fail if you look at them crooked.
73 de K3HVG



--
Posted Via Newsfeeds.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Service
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.Newsfeeds.com


Tio Pedro February 12th 09 12:13 AM

3395 AM Filter
 

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
ICM and JAN are both this way and they are both absolute joys to deal

with.
They know what you want, they know how to make it, and they know what a
fair price is.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."


Jan, ICM, and Sentry... I must have spend hundreds of bucks
when I was a young ham on FM crystals for the latest Motorola
or RCA twoway castoff I was converting for one of the VHF or
UHF ham bands! I remember when ICM had cheap EX grade
crystals for experimenters, and when JAN would mail you
list of cheap surplus crystals they had on hand.

Pete



kh[_2_] February 12th 09 09:51 AM

3395 AM Filter
 
On Feb 9, 10:14*pm, " wrote:
Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? *TNX 73 *Harold


Heathkit AM filters show up on eBay and at hamfests from time to time.

There are two types, big and little. They work in different radio's.
The big filters are from the first SB radios. SB-300 used the big
filter, the SB-301 and SB-303 used the small filter.

Within the types, there are two bandwidths available. 3.5 kHz and 5.0
kHz.

The 3.5 was the optional filter for the SB ham band receivers like the
SB-300, SB-301 and SB-303.

The 5.0 was the STANDARD filter for the SB SWL receiver like the
SB-310 and the SB-313.

Expect to pay about $30 for a 3.5 and $100 for a 5.0 filter. The 3.5
is not "full frequency" and the 5.0 is more hi-fi.

You can force fit either filter type in any SB receiver but look for
the proper size and it will bolt in.

good luck.

Fred McKenzie February 16th 09 06:09 PM

3395 AM Filter
 
In article
,
" wrote:

Looking to buy a 3395 AM filter as used in early tube Heathkit
receivers..any other suggestions on receiving AM with homebuilt filter
system? TNX 73 Harold


Harold-

There was a thread a few weeks ago, about someone buying out Heath's
remaining parts and manuals. I understand the company is still in
business, just not selling kits. http://www.heathkit.com/ If you
give them a call, they might tell you how to contact the person or
company that bought their old parts. There may be a slim chance your
filter is available.

Fred
K4DII


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com