In article ,
Bill M wrote:

| Wikipedia is wrong. Howard Armstrong was indeed working on the
| superheterodyne in 1918:
|
| Wilkipedia usually is wrong. Its compiled with 'user' input. You could
| submit that YOU were the inventor!

.... and it'll probably get reverted shortly after.

Wikipedia is usually right. Yes, it's true that anybody can edit it
-- even you! But mistakes are made, and the people who write things
aren't always experts in the subject area. Still, Wikipedia is very
impressive.

Since you know the answer, why not go over and correct the article?

--
Doug McLaren,
"Never appeal to a man's better nature. He may not have one.
Invoking his self interest give you more leverage." --Robert Heinlein

Doug McLaren wrote:
In article ,
Bill M wrote:

| Wikipedia is wrong. Howard Armstrong was indeed working on the
| superheterodyne in 1918:
|
| Wilkipedia usually is wrong. Its compiled with 'user' input. You could
| submit that YOU were the inventor!

... and it'll probably get reverted shortly after.

Wikipedia is usually right. Yes, it's true that anybody can edit it
-- even you! But mistakes are made, and the people who write things
aren't always experts in the subject area. Still, Wikipedia is very
impressive.

Since you know the answer, why not go over and correct the article?

Since you want to make a big deal out of it, I have done such a thing on
certain topics in the past only to have them "recorrected" by those with
different facts and an agenda to promote.
You can do considerably better than this source for factual information.
It can't be assumed to be any more correct than a chat room.

-Bill