LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 21st 05, 07:11 PM
Doug McLaren
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Bill M wrote:

| Wikipedia is wrong. Howard Armstrong was indeed working on the
| superheterodyne in 1918:
|
| Wilkipedia usually is wrong. Its compiled with 'user' input. You could
| submit that YOU were the inventor!

.... and it'll probably get reverted shortly after.

Wikipedia is usually right. Yes, it's true that anybody can edit it
-- even you! But mistakes are made, and the people who write things
aren't always experts in the subject area. Still, Wikipedia is very
impressive.

Since you know the answer, why not go over and correct the article?

--
Doug McLaren,
"Never appeal to a man's better nature. He may not have one.
Invoking his self interest give you more leverage." --Robert Heinlein


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 6 October 20th 03 09:52 PM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 0 October 18th 03 10:06 PM
Dipoles & Tuned Circuits Reg Edwards Antenna 0 October 16th 03 11:54 PM
HF Receivers FS milradio Equipment 0 September 29th 03 09:44 AM
RF amps: tuned load in Class A? Don Pearce Homebrew 141 September 15th 03 05:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017