Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 11th 03, 07:39 PM
Scott Schrader
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nah, the warheads could be reused

PJ wrote:

Looks like a fine piece of equipment, but rumored to fail after the first
use.

Phil


-- If it's a "new economy," why do they want my obsolete old money?
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 11th 03, 08:33 PM
George R. Gonzalez
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Stinson" wrote in message
...
Trying to identify a vacuum tube based missle seeker head.



Can anyone ID this? The box said "NIKE AJAX."



"Nike Ajax" was one of the first anti-aircraft city defense systems ever.
It was ably designed by Bell labs to act like a short-range detection,
tracking, and interception system.

But if you do the math of coastlines vs radar vs missle range vs costs, you
quickly discover you'd need about 600 times the GNP of the USA to put up
enough of these to intercept 75% of the bombers. Oh, and they knew that
very soon the bombers would be obsoleted by ICBM's, which would completely
obsolete the whole Nike shebang.

Even in the free spending 1950's there was only enough spare $ to put up a
miniscule shield. Many of the Nike sites were put up in full view of major
public thoroughfares, to reassure the public that the US govt was on the
job!

When the Nike sites were tested against actual "attacking" bombers (ours),
the results were less than stupendous. No problem, the results were
classified.

To further boondoggle things, the Feds didnt want to run the sites, so they
somehow delegated the job to each state's National Guard. Mild
contradictions with the US Constitution, quickly fixed by a flurry of
individual "treaties" between the State Dept and the 50 states. Now you try
scheduling the part-time NG troops to man these sites 24/7 with any kind of
effectiveness.

My neighbor was a programmer on Nike-Ajax. IHRC they had a custom-designed
computer that tried to track targets in real-time. The computer had some
parallel-processing capability designed in by the Lab wizards. But the
programmers quickly found out that all that extra parallel hardware was
almost impossible to harness. (Much like the discoveries of later
generations!). So the computers couldnt keep up with a typical target mix,
much less with jamming or bad weather.

Count yourself lucky, you're one of the few people that have benefited from
Nike (the system, not the shoe) !













  #3   Report Post  
Old August 12th 03, 09:15 PM
Martin Potter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"George R. Gonzalez" ) writes:

Even in the free spending 1950's there was only enough spare $ to put up a
miniscule shield. Many of the Nike sites were put up in full view of major
public thoroughfares, to reassure the public that the US govt was on the
job!


Yes, I remember seeing one site just off a main street in
Detroit, MI. The site was surrounded by a high fence but
citizens (and visitors from Canada, like me) could easily see
the missiles sticking up above the fence. This was early '50s.

Just wonder if the second part of the name (Ajax, Hercules, etc)
refers to the booster rocket that the Nike was mounted on. I
recall that some upper atmospheric research rockets were mounted
on Ajax boosters.

.... Martin VE3OAT


  #6   Report Post  
Old August 11th 03, 11:03 PM
George R. Gonzalez
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Byrns" wrote in message
...
In article , "George R. Gonzalez"



Doesn't look like much of a manual, looks more like the table of contents
for one chapter.


Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/



oops, there should have been links in there...

Here's the link to the whole manual, scroll down a bit to get to your
stuff...


http://ed-thelen.org/tm9-5000-28.html



Regards,


George





  #7   Report Post  
Old August 11th 03, 11:44 PM
David Stinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"George R. Gonzalez" wrote:

Here's the link to the whole manual,


Thank you very much for your kindness!
  #8   Report Post  
Old August 12th 03, 03:45 PM
George R. Gonzalez
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Stinson" wrote in message
...
"George R. Gonzalez" wrote:

Here's the link to the whole manual,


Thank you very much for your kindness!


Hey, I didnt do the hard part, scanning and OCR'ing the manual!


I would love to see the actual schematics of this thingy.....




  #10   Report Post  
Old August 16th 03, 10:00 PM
Williams
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well of course it's a guidance system, silly! They could use just a pocket
radio for a receiver.
I wonder if the Nike Ajax used any gyros at all, if the radar guidance
uplink was continuous from launch.
I imagine The Military Masterminds would not have expected the 'Bears' to be
accompanied by radar suppressing 'Thuds': "Fishboobs".
Also, what kind of propellant/oxidant was used?
Also, was the uplink data stream encrypted?
What kind of warhead did the nike Ajax have?
Inquiring minds want to know.

David Stinson wrote in message
...
Trying to identify a vacuum tube based missle seeker head.



Can anyone ID this? The box said "NIKE AJAX."

Thanks,
Dave S.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free Boatanchors Jerry W. O'Dell Boatanchors 1 July 21st 03 12:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017