Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 13th 03, 02:12 AM
Carl
 
Posts: n/a
Default 73 Magazine Says "73 and QRT"

That is right, Zenith did not believe Heath was profitable except for the early
PC stuff.

Many companies that once were the cutting edge technology now are just
a trademark that brings in revenue to the new parent company, like
the Heath and Zenith names. Another brand that had a large following is
Westinghouse, now under license to Angelo Bros. Lighting in Phil. PA
for all lighting and ceiling fan products.

carl


If memory serves, Heath didn't throw in the towel, per se.

Zenith bought them out for their computer(s) and terminals and then Zenith
tossed out nearly all of Heath except those items.

About two years ago, I was in a Home Depot and came across some
sensory-motion fictures that were labeled as "Zenith-Heath". What that is (or
was) about, I have no idea.

My first kit was a Heath Q-1. I was ten or eleven years old and had bought an
used S-38B with my paper route money.

I used ,y Dad's 350-watt soldering iron and cold soldered (what else?) every
connection.

A friendly ham helped me out.

Gray Shockley


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 13th 03, 02:12 AM
Carl
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is right, Zenith did not believe Heath was profitable except for the early
PC stuff.

Many companies that once were the cutting edge technology now are just
a trademark that brings in revenue to the new parent company, like
the Heath and Zenith names. Another brand that had a large following is
Westinghouse, now under license to Angelo Bros. Lighting in Phil. PA
for all lighting and ceiling fan products.

carl


If memory serves, Heath didn't throw in the towel, per se.

Zenith bought them out for their computer(s) and terminals and then Zenith
tossed out nearly all of Heath except those items.

About two years ago, I was in a Home Depot and came across some
sensory-motion fictures that were labeled as "Zenith-Heath". What that is (or
was) about, I have no idea.

My first kit was a Heath Q-1. I was ten or eleven years old and had bought an
used S-38B with my paper route money.

I used ,y Dad's 350-watt soldering iron and cold soldered (what else?) every
connection.

A friendly ham helped me out.

Gray Shockley


  #3   Report Post  
Old October 14th 03, 02:25 AM
Edward Knobloch
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Biz WDØHCO wrote:
The "April fools" issue

snip

I one I love was the "MAD Magazine" issue. The cover had ol Alfred E. Newman
soldering a radio chassis with a big 300 watt soldering gun saying "What, me
solder?" Inside the issue was "Ham versus Ham" comic strip which was a
parody of "Spy Versus Spy". That whole issue had me in stitches for days.

Ha, yes. Alfred E. Newman was shown soldering the spliced power wires
to his own soldering iron. Callsign badge: WN1ECCH.

My favorite 73 cover was the one showing a chessboard. The pieces
were various size vacuum tubes. 813 = king, 811A = queen,
829B = bishop, 6146 with ceramic plate connector attached = knight,
lighthouse tube = castle, 6C4 = pawns.

73,
Ed

  #4   Report Post  
Old October 14th 03, 02:25 AM
Edward Knobloch
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Biz WDØHCO wrote:
The "April fools" issue

snip

I one I love was the "MAD Magazine" issue. The cover had ol Alfred E. Newman
soldering a radio chassis with a big 300 watt soldering gun saying "What, me
solder?" Inside the issue was "Ham versus Ham" comic strip which was a
parody of "Spy Versus Spy". That whole issue had me in stitches for days.

Ha, yes. Alfred E. Newman was shown soldering the spliced power wires
to his own soldering iron. Callsign badge: WN1ECCH.

My favorite 73 cover was the one showing a chessboard. The pieces
were various size vacuum tubes. 813 = king, 811A = queen,
829B = bishop, 6146 with ceramic plate connector attached = knight,
lighthouse tube = castle, 6C4 = pawns.

73,
Ed

  #5   Report Post  
Old October 15th 03, 12:25 AM
Alan Douglas
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If I'm remembering right, fairly early on Wayne sold them, and they
were $37. In 1973, he sold them for $73.


When I bought mine they were $50, and yes, I've been receiving it
every month since then, with no renewal notices, no complaints. I'm
amazed it's lasted as long as it has, given the declining content.

Sad to see it go, but the back issues are still useful (I looked up
a 1967 article just yesterday). You could do a lot worse things with
your life than publishing such a magazine.

73, Alan


  #6   Report Post  
Old October 15th 03, 02:28 AM
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Douglas adouglasatgis.net wrote:
If I'm remembering right, fairly early on Wayne sold them, and they
were $37. In 1973, he sold them for $73.


When I bought mine they were $50, and yes, I've been receiving it
every month since then, with no renewal notices, no complaints. I'm
amazed it's lasted as long as it has, given the declining content.


Hey, you did the right thing. I'm one of the guys who bought the lifetime
subscription to '80 Micro.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 15th 03, 02:28 AM
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Douglas adouglasatgis.net wrote:
If I'm remembering right, fairly early on Wayne sold them, and they
were $37. In 1973, he sold them for $73.


When I bought mine they were $50, and yes, I've been receiving it
every month since then, with no renewal notices, no complaints. I'm
amazed it's lasted as long as it has, given the declining content.


Hey, you did the right thing. I'm one of the guys who bought the lifetime
subscription to '80 Micro.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 15th 03, 12:25 AM
Alan Douglas
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If I'm remembering right, fairly early on Wayne sold them, and they
were $37. In 1973, he sold them for $73.


When I bought mine they were $50, and yes, I've been receiving it
every month since then, with no renewal notices, no complaints. I'm
amazed it's lasted as long as it has, given the declining content.

Sad to see it go, but the back issues are still useful (I looked up
a 1967 article just yesterday). You could do a lot worse things with
your life than publishing such a magazine.

73, Alan
  #9   Report Post  
Old October 21st 03, 05:27 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In rec.radio.amateur.dx Biz WDØHCO wrote:

I one I love was the "MAD Magazine" issue. The cover had ol Alfred E. Newman
soldering a radio chassis with a big 300 watt soldering gun saying "What, me
solder?" Inside the issue was "Ham versus Ham" comic strip which was a
parody of "Spy Versus Spy". That whole issue had me in stitches for days.


Wayne certainly had a great sense of humor. My favorite was
when Wayne printed a letter from the XYL of a subscriber
complaining about the 73 covers of scantily clad hotties and
that her husband didn't need to see such trash and to cancel
his subscription immediately.

73 Don K6LTS
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017