Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Original message:
From: David Stinson Subject: OT: Open Letter from a Green Beret to John Kerry (copy of editorial by Don Bendell snipped) Mr. Stinson, are you employed by, a volunteer at, or otherwise associated with the Bush for President campaign? It's interesting to note that when I did a Google search of "Don Bendell" the first site that comes up is titled "Welcome to Bendell Enterprises": it has a link to Mr. Bendell's agent prominently displayed on the page. The fact that Mr. Bendell is, as a Republican spokesman, so obviously (you'll excuse the pun) "bush league" is indicative of how desperately the Republican National Spin Meisters are trying to find anything or anyone who will denigrate Senator Kerry's war record. No matter: Mr. Bendell was there, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. I doubt that his recollection is the only valid one of that place or time, and I also doubt that he has the one true account of Vietnam. Loyal service, even as part of an A team, does not grant an old soldier the right to rewrite history. I was there, too: and everything John Kerry said is true. That Mr. Bendell didn't see it doesn't mean it didn't happen: he is entitled to support and protect the memory of his comrades, as am I - but not at the expense of whitewashing what others have documented. Yes, some soldiers _did_ cut the ears off VC dead. Yes, some soldiers did other unspeakable things: just ask Rusty Calley if you don't believe me. Some of it, I saw with my own eyes, some I read in the courts-martial and/or arrest reports I saw as a Military Policeman. Mr. Bendell is entitled to be proud of his relatives who are in the National Guard, especially in peacetime when there's little chance they'll be put in harm's way - and I am entitled to hold someone who is standing for election to a higher standard. The rich and powerful have a greater obligation to the ideal of service than do ordinary men and women, and Shrub wasn't there. Whatever Mr. Bendell's perception of the Vietnam war is, he's not entitled to shoot the messenger who first brought the ugly, sad truth to America's attention in a way that could not be denied or swept under the rug. That John Kerry chose to leave the war zone early is no shame: nobody who's been shot at blames another for taking advantage of the "three strikes" rule, which spelled out early return for a sailor who was wounded three times. Only an former General Officer like President Eisenhower could tell the military brass "I will not send one American boy into that elephant grass", and for the same reasons, only a decorated commander like John Kerry could have founded Vietnam Veterans Against the War. At a time in our nation's history when the rich and well connected were scurrying to park their sons' yachts in safe backwaters, a well connected young man raised his hand, took an oath, and took everything that came with it. You can't fake that kind of courage, and you can't spin his opponent's kind of cowardice. John Kerry was there. Bill Warren P.S. Readers are invited to cross-post this to any newsgroup where Mr. Bendell's editorials are appearing. P.P.S. FWIW, some soldiers did kill dogs: the unfortunate animals couldn't read signs, and those that were lucky enough to wander through a minefield unscathed would, sad to say, leaves tracks that Viet Minh sappers could follow. I did, too: in my case, as a courtesy to our Vietnamese workers, who wanted them for food but were unable to participate in butchery because of their religeous beliefs. (William Warren is a pseudonym I use to protect my privacy. I will respond with my actual name to anyone who asks offline: modify the return address in an obvious way to email me directly. I don't work for the Kerry campaign, or the government, or the Democratic party, and have never even met the Senator.) |