Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 26th 04, 03:54 AM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rich" wrote in message
...
I found an EH Scott SLR-12-B (Navy? 'morale') receiver
(550kc-16Mc) for sale. I would like to know what ($) to offer for it
presuming good working condition. I have not been able to find much
information about this set on the internet. If you know of any EH
Scott BA resources I would appreciate if you share them with me. TIA!


I've posted a page about the Scott REE receiver from Fred Osterman's
"Shortwave Radios Past & Present" on the alt.binaries.pictures.radio group.
The REE seems very similar to your description of the SLR-12-B radio.

The circled numbers on the lower chart mean:

1 -- New price unknown
5 -- Used price unknown
6 -- Insufficent information available for a value rating

No prices, but the other info may be useful.

Here's a sales flyer I found very interesting about EH Scott and one of his
fancy civilian shortwave radios:

http://www181.pair.com/otsw/Scott.html

Frank Dresser


  #3   Report Post  
Old March 26th 04, 06:07 PM
Mike Knudsen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Ron Hershey
writes:

There's a few pics and schematics here
http://www.schroeder-dieball.com/scottradiolabs/
but not a lot on the merchant marine sets.


Beautiful photos, of sets clear back to the 201-A days, and later ones with
more chrome than a '58 Olds.

The RCH entry is a single photo of the same radio I have, with a Hammarlund or
SX-28 style dial. I believe "RCH" is also used for a slide-rule dial type
Scott.

My RCH is probably a backup comm rx, not a morale entertainment set, since it
unfortunately sacrifices the AM BC band to include two LW bands, as for marine
communications. It does provide for feeding a second audio source into its
output stage; unclear what that was used for. The audio output is a single 6F6
or 6V6 or the like, so this RX would not be driving speakers all over the ship.
73, Mike K.

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 27th 04, 12:44 PM
Alan Douglas
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

My RCH is probably a backup comm rx, not a morale entertainment set, since it
unfortunately sacrifices the AM BC band to include two LW bands, as for marine
communications. It does provide for feeding a second audio source into its
output stage; unclear what that was used for. The audio output is a single 6F6
or 6V6 or the like, so this RX would not be driving speakers all over the ship.
73, Mike K.


You can see one installed in a Mackay communications console in the
4th ed. of THe Radio Manual by Sterling & Monroe, 1950. Pages 511 to
553 are devoted to this console, including a fold-out schematic of the
Scott receiver itself (called an SLR-F). It was paired with a Mackay
128AV (15 - 650kHz, battery-powered)

Scott made a big deal of low-radiation receivers and German
direction-finding, but it's far more likely that the low radiation was
only to avoid interference with other receivers on the ship. It's a
very crowded RF environment.

I had an SLR12 once and its dial-drive mechanism was sluggish, not
a set you'd want for band-cruising. They were after all meant to be
left in one position and not re-tuned often. The geared dial on an
RCH works like a dream, in comparison.

73, Alan
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 27th 04, 06:22 PM
Mike Knudsen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Alan Douglas
adouglasatgis.net writes:

You can see one installed in a Mackay communications console in the
4th ed. of THe Radio Manual by Sterling & Monroe, 1950. Pages 511 to
553 are devoted to this console, including a fold-out schematic of the
Scott receiver itself (called an SLR-F). It was paired with a Mackay
128AV (15 - 650kHz, battery-powered)


Does this mean the RCH served as the audio output stage for the Mackay? I can
imagine a lot of military rx wer made with only "line level" or "diode load"
outputs, meant to feed RTTY decoders and the like, and the RCH wuld provide a
speaker audio driver for such rx.

Scott made a big deal of low-radiation receivers and German
direction-finding, but it's far more likely that the low radiation was
only to avoid interference with other receivers on the ship. It's a
very crowded RF environment.


True, and this is why the R390 series has such a rugged multi-tuned front end,
and well into the sorry-state era was specified for shipboard use because it
could stand up to the onboard transmitters.

I had an SLR12 once and its dial-drive mechanism was sluggish, not
a set you'd want for band-cruising. They were after all meant to be
left in one position and not re-tuned often. The geared dial on an
RCH works like a dream, in comparison.


Right, the RCH tuning is silky smooth. Too bad Scott didn't put a vernier
0-100 readout on the knob shaft for ease in returning to a station, although
the 0-200 logging scale is better than nothing. I suspect some ops may have
put a 0-100 skirted knob on that shaft and scribed an index mark on the front
panel.

Since the RCH has a BFO with pitch control, I tend to believe it was for backup
comm rather than entertainment. Lack of xtal filter makes it only a backup for
CW.


Tnx fer the commentary, Alan. 73, Mike K. AA1UK

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.


  #6   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 03:46 AM
Alan Douglas
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

You can see one installed in a Mackay communications console in the
4th ed. of THe Radio Manual by Sterling & Monroe, 1950. Pages 511 to
553 are devoted to this console, including a fold-out schematic of the
Scott receiver itself (called an SLR-F). It was paired with a Mackay
128AV (15 - 650kHz, battery-powered)


Does this mean the RCH served as the audio output stage for the Mackay? I can
imagine a lot of military rx wer made with only "line level" or "diode load"
outputs, meant to feed RTTY decoders and the like, and the RCH wuld provide a
speaker audio driver for such rx.


If I'm reading the text correctly, position 2 was not used, but the
"Mixed" mode fed time signals to check the chronometer.

73, Alan
  #7   Report Post  
Old March 26th 04, 01:48 PM
Rich
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks to all for taking the time to reply. The historic background
from Biz & Bill puts this set in some context for me. Frank, thanks
for posting the Ostermann page to the binaries. Ron I appreciate the
website resource. If you are interested I have posted a photo of the
Scott , as well as some other items I found, at the following link;

http://home.att.net/~richs_radios/Whats_New.html

Also a friend supplied me with a large Scott advertisement via email.
I cut out the image of a Scott 'marine model' set and posted it next
to the SLR for comparison.
  #8   Report Post  
Old March 26th 04, 09:43 PM
Rich
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What a great source of information/history you all have provided. This
was a third party transaction. Sadly the primary party (the owner?)
called off the deal. It appears he has discovered another buyer (?).
It seems I missed my chance and (sadly) won't see any of these items
any time soon. Life goes on... Thanks to all for the assistance and
especially the history - great stuff! Any additional history is
appreciated and encouraged since there does not seem to be much
recorded except in the minds of the survivors.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Heath DX-60 Transmitter: GR-78 Receiver Bruce Stock Boatanchors 0 March 17th 04 06:21 PM
FS: E. H. Scott RCH HF Receiver Spare Parts Kit Larry Johnson Boatanchors 0 September 28th 03 08:31 PM
FS: E. H. Scott RCH HF Receiver Spare Parts Kit Larry Johnson Boatanchors 0 September 28th 03 08:31 PM
fs rca cr91a communications receiver Chris Fuller Boatanchors 0 August 22nd 03 08:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017