"Bill M" wrote in message
...
cl wrote:




A code/system would be good, but it still falls prey to those "rip off
artists" who don't represent their goods in a faithful manner. I've seen
some stuff marked mint, which well... could have been mint - I suppose. I
seen still others marked mint which were pure trash and better served as
land fill. ANYONE trading/buying used - especially online - should expect
"something" to be wrong, even if very slight in nature. Both parties
SHOULD be honest, fully explaining anything that even looks shady about
their equipment.

cl

Hey Lou, how about "Mint for its age"!

-Bill M

I could probably go along with that! At least if it is in decent shape for
being the age it is.

cl